Compare commits

...

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jesse Vincent affa7fa4e2 feat: add diagnosing-superpowers skill
Evidence-based diagnosis of superpowers sessions: intake with the human
partner, safe transcript reading for Claude Code and Codex (discovery
procedure for other harnesses), seven analyst subagents, a report with
path:line evidence and a bounded superpowers-involvement line, scrubbed
export bundles, approval-gated GitHub issue search/draft, and
similar-session search. Includes spec, plan, structure test, and README
and docs index lines.

Developed RED-GREEN-REFACTOR per writing-skills: 46 scored scenario runs
across five SKILL.md versions, all twelve scenarios clean against the
final version, micro-tests control 5/5 to skill 0/5 on both
baseline-failing prohibitions, and one end-to-end run. Eval records are
kept by the maintainer outside the repo.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DyaGKhTXvHNs2JgPhDktz7
2026-08-31 10:03:57 -07:00
Kattni fd02874aa5 Update to Prime Radiant Community Code of Conduct. (#2122) 2026-08-12 15:31:42 -07:00
Jesse Vincent 777ceb5e12 Merge main back into dev after the v6.3.0 rebase-merge 2026-08-12 09:56:30 -07:00
Jesse Vincent b36e0829c6 Release v6.3.0: Devin CLI and Hermes Agent support, brainstorming three-path router, SDD/Codex efficiency fixes (#2125)
* fix(codex): suppress SessionStart hook auto-discovery with empty hooks object

Codex auto-discovers a plugin's hooks/hooks.json whenever the Codex
manifest has no `hooks` field: load_plugin_hooks falls back to a
hardcoded DEFAULT_HOOKS_CONFIG_FILE = "hooks/hooks.json" and registers
it. hooks/hooks.json is the Claude Code SessionStart hook, it is tracked
in this repo, and the Codex marketplace installs the whole repo root
(source url "./"), so the fallback re-registered the SessionStart hook
and its install-time trust prompt on Codex.

Removing the Codex hook file and the manifest `hooks` pointer (commit
"Remove Codex hooks") did not disable the hook on Codex — it removed the
explicit declaration that was overriding the fallback, so the fallback
took over and found the Claude hooks/hooks.json.

Declare an empty inline hooks object ({}) in .codex-plugin/plugin.json.
It parses as an empty inline hook set and stops Codex reaching the
auto-discovery fallback. An absent field, an empty array ([]), and an
empty inline list all collapse back to the fallback, so the value must
be exactly {}.

Update the test to assert the manifest declares hooks: {} (and that
hooks/hooks.json exists, which is what makes the declaration necessary),
replacing the prior assertion that the field was absent — which passed
while the hook was still being auto-discovered.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add Codex portal package script

* Harden Codex package script checks

* Default Codex portal package to zip

* Fix Codex plugin category

* chore(codex): remove orphaned session-start-codex hook + refresh hook docs

hooks/session-start-codex has had no caller since "Remove Codex hooks"
(#1845) deleted hooks-codex.json and its manifest registration; the
Codex manifest now declares an empty hooks object so Codex registers no
session-start hook at all. The script is Codex-specific dead code —
nothing executes it on Codex or any other harness.

- Delete hooks/session-start-codex.
- tests/hooks/test-session-start.sh: drop the two Codex cases that are
  redundant with the generic session-start tests (nested-format and the
  legacy-warning omission are already covered by the Claude Code cases).
  Re-point the "wrapper dispatches" case to the live `session-start`
  script so run-hook.cmd dispatch coverage — used by Claude Code and
  Cursor in production — is preserved rather than lost.
- docs/porting-to-a-new-harness.md: Codex is no longer a Shape A
  (shell-hook) harness, so re-anchor that worked example to Cursor (a
  live shell-hook harness that demonstrates the same per-harness field,
  schema, and matcher variance) and mark Codex as native skill discovery
  with no session-start hook. Clears the references to the deleted
  hooks-codex.json.
- docs/windows/polyglot-hooks.md: the "check hooks-codex.json" pointer
  referenced a file deleted in #1845; re-point to hooks-cursor.json.

RELEASE-NOTES.md keeps its historical mention of hooks-codex.json (it
accurately records what that release did). The tests/codex-plugin-sync
fixtures build their own synthetic session-start-codex and test the sync
mechanism generically, so they are intentionally left as-is.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: re-anchor Shape A examples away from Codex

* Strip hooks from Codex portal package

* Preserve hooks in Codex package manifest

* Release v6.1.1: fix Codex SessionStart hook re-registration, add Codex portal packaging

* Revert "Remove Gemini CLI support"

This reverts commit 711d895ce7.

* refactor(skills): fold Integration skill lists into points of use

The list-style Integration sections in subagent-driven-development and
executing-plans duplicated references that already exist where the flow
uses them (process digraph, When to Use, prompt templates, Step 3), so
they added maintenance cost without carrying behavior. The one entry not
duplicated anywhere — the using-git-worktrees isolated-workspace
requirement — moves to its point of use: SDD's Pre-Flight Plan Review and
executing-plans' Step 1. Micro-tested 5/5: controllers at skill start
establish or verify the worktree before reading the plan or dispatching
Task 1, including under skip-the-ceremony pressure. The prose Integration
sections in requesting-code-review and other skills are unchanged — they
carry placement content, not an index.

* refactor(skills): fold systematic-debugging Related-skills block into Phase 4

Same treatment as subagent-driven-development and executing-plans: the
test-driven-development entry duplicated the reference already at Phase 4
Step 1, and the verification-before-completion entry was a sole carrier —
it moves to its point of use in Phase 4 Step 3 (Verify Fix). Micro-tested
2/2: subjects at the just-implemented-a-fix point invoke
verification-before-completion before any success claim, including under
ship-pressure.

* refactor(skills): stop offering to discard work in finishing-a-development-branch

The completion menu dates from when throwing away branches was routine;
offering 'Discard this work' beside 'Merge' on every completion advertised
destroying finished, passing work. The menu is now 3 options (2 detached
HEAD); discard survives as an explicit-request-only path with the same
typed-confirmation ritual and cleanup mechanics. Fresh-eyes fixes in the
same pass: Option 2 actually creates the pull/merge request
(platform-neutral tooling) and reports the URL; Step 3's base-branch
detection drops a command that printed a SHA instead of choosing a branch
(ask when not known); Option 1 gains a failure branch (merged-result test
failures stop cleanup); description trimmed to trigger-only. Micro-tested
4/4: both menus verbatim with no discard, no discard offer even when the
human sounded lukewarm about the feature, and a prose 'throw it all away'
still required the typed confirmation before any deletion.

* refactor(skills): make PR creation forge-agnostic in finishing-a-development-branch

Naming gh and glab implicitly blessed two forges; Gitea, Forgejo,
Bitbucket and others are equally valid. Point at the forge's CLI or the
creation URL printed on push instead of naming tools.

* refactor(skills): compress finishing-a-development-branch, adopt rationalization table

Red Flags and Common Mistakes fold into one Common Rationalizations table
(house Excuse/Reality form); every prior entry maps to a table row or an
inline sentence in the step it guards. Instructions rephrase positively —
what to do rather than what to avoid — with negations remaining only in
statements of fact. Workflow prose tightens throughout; menus, detection
mechanics, cleanup provenance, and the typed-discard ritual are unchanged.
Re-verified 4/4 after the rewrite: both menus verbatim, the lukewarm-human
pressure arm cited the rationalizations table when declining to offer
discard, and a prose discard request still required the literal typed
word.

* fix(skills): capture worktree path before Step 5 changes directory

Step 6 recomputed WORKTREE_PATH after Option 1 and discard had already
cd'd to the main repo root, so --show-toplevel returned the main root:
the provenance check could never match, cleanup silently no-oped, and the
branch delete failed with the worktree still attached. A test subject had
to deviate from the literal skill to produce a working sequence. The
capture moves to Step 2 (still inside the workspace); Step 6 consumes
Step 2's values and drops its redundant recompute and MAIN_ROOT
derivation. Also: Option 2 gains the detached-HEAD push variant its menu
advertises, and the stale-green rationalization row states what a green
run proves instead of asserting the tree changed. Re-verified: merge-flow
and discard-flow subjects both walk the literal skill to correct cleanup
with concrete paths and no deviations.

* refactor(skills): reframe testing-anti-patterns as writing-good-tests

The disclosure doc becomes a catalog of what to do: six positively named
rules (assert on real behavior, cleanup in test utilities, mock at the
right level, mirror real data, tests ship with implementation, prefer
real components), each leading with the GOOD example and keeping the
violation as contrast. Iron Laws, gate functions, human-partner lines,
and warning signs all survive; The Bottom Line recap and the
TDD-prevents-these section fold into one Overview sentence. SKILL.md's
pointer moves into the Good Tests section it belongs with. Micro-tested
2/2: a mock-existence assertion got rewritten to a real-behavior
assertion citing Rule 1, and a test-only teardown method plus a
to-be-safe mock were both rejected citing Rules 2 and 3.

* fix(skills): broaden writing-good-tests trigger to any test writing

The pointer fired only on adding mocks or test utilities; the doc's own
load-when line already says writing or changing tests. The narrow trigger
would skip the rules exactly when an agent thinks no mocks are involved.

* feat(skills): absorb falsifiability discipline into writing-good-tests

Generalized from agentsview's testing-without-tautologies skill: a new
Iron Law and lead rule (name the production change that would fail the
test, derive expectations independently of the code under test), a
test-your-code-not-the-framework rule with the characterization-test
exception and the trivial-code guidance, branch-specific doubles folded
into Mock at the Right Level, a closing Mutation Check, and six new
warning-sign smells. Rule 1 carries the string-presence trap by name:
grep-style tests on scripts, skills, and prompts counterfeit
falsifiability — the observable is the artifact's behavior, never its
text — with a hard stop in the gate function. Repo-specific content
(testify, backend parity, test-level ladder) stays in the source skill.
Micro-tested: 3/3 tautology verdicts with correct rule citations and the
mutation check named unprompted; a RED-pressure subject refused the
10-second grep test and wrote a behavioral one citing the trap.

* fix(skills): close the change-detector hole in writing-good-tests

Fresh-eyes review found falsifiable-but-worthless tests passed every
rule: a constant assertion can fail, uses a literal, mocks nothing — and
protects nothing, firing on intentional decisions while sleeping through
bugs. Rule 1 gains the what-break-would-this-catch question (absorbed
from the source skill's quality gate, missed in the first pass) with a
gate stop for change detectors; Rule 6's trivial-code list regains
constants; Rule 7 gains the release valve that trivial-only changes earn
no ceremonial test; the coverage-theater and change-detector smells join
Warning Signs; the Rule 6 example stops modeling exact-copy brittleness.
Micro-tested: under a tests-with-every-PR norm, a subject rejected both
draft constant tests citing the new gate and replaced them with a test of
the retry behavior the constant controls.

* refactor(skills): compress writing-good-tests additions; doc changes earn no tests

Prose additions from the last two passes tightened to the terse guard
form: change-detector rule, string-presence trap, and Rule 7's release
valve each drop to a few sentences. Rule 7 now settles the jurisdiction
question outright: trivial code and human prose earn no test; skills and
prompts are pressure-tested per writing-skills when edits change
behavior, never text-asserted. Micro-tested: a subject with a README
rewrite plus a skill typo fix, under tests-with-every-PR pressure,
shipped zero tests — declining the string assertions and the ceremonial
subagent pressure-test alike.

* experiment: ground-up two-principle rewrite of writing-good-tests

Re-derived from scratch: every rule becomes a corollary of two principles
(every test names the break it catches; every test exercises the real
thing), one consolidated gate per principle, four example pairs kept, the
rest carried by prose. Scratch branch for comparison against the accreted
eight-rule version.

* refactor(skills): drop social proof from dispatching-parallel-agents

Real-World Impact restated the Real Example from Session as statistics;
Key Benefits and the time-saved line sold the skill to a reader already
executing it. Instructions unchanged.

* refactor(skills): drop social proof from systematic-debugging

Real-World Impact was statistics; the Overview opener restated the core
principle as motivation. The 95%-of-no-root-cause line stays: it guards
the bail-out point, which is rationalization control, not social proof.
Supporting Techniques/Related skills untouched (PR #1932 owns that).

* refactor(skills): drop persuasion sections from verification-before-completion

Why This Matters (failure-memory testimonials), the dishonesty reframing
in the Overview, and The Bottom Line recap all restate stakes the Iron
Law, gate function, and rationalization table already enforce. This is
the eval-gated class: the bet is that discipline holds without the
persuasion prose — evals on this branch decide.

* refactor(skills): trim quality claim from executing-plans subagent note

The tell-your-partner directive and the prefer-SDD instruction stay; the
significantly-higher-quality sentence restated them as a claim.
Integration section untouched (PR #1932 owns it).

* refactor(skills): drop Advantages section from subagent-driven-development

Five blocks of benefits and cost/benefit selling aimed at a reader who
has already invoked the skill; the vs-Executing-Plans comparison also
duplicates the one under When to Use. Integration section untouched
(PR #1932 owns it).

* refactor(skills): trim requesting-code-review, keep review guards as a table

Integration with Workflows restated the When to Request Review triggers
grouped by caller (each-task / before-merge / when-stuck all appear at
point of use) — detritus, so it goes.

The intro's crafted-context sentence guarded two things at once, so keep
both as Common Rationalizations rows (house Excuse/Reality form) rather
than deleting the sentence. The skill's reader is the coordinator, not
the code's author:

- Don't review the diff inline — that burns the coordinator's context
  window; dispatch a subagent so the diff and evaluation live in its
  context and only findings return. ("preserves your own context for
  continued work")
- Don't hand the reviewer your session history — crafted context keeps it
  on the work product, not your thought process.

* refactor(skills): convert using-git-worktrees guard sections to rationalization table

Common Mistakes and Red Flags restated Steps 0-3 wholesale; both fold
into one Common Rationalizations table (house Excuse/Reality form) whose
five rows carry the tempting-thought version of each rule, including the
#1-mistake emphasis on bypassing native tools. Quick Reference stays as
the compact decision aid.

* refactor(skills): fold brainstorming Key Principles into points of use

Five of six principles restated the Checklist and Process sections
verbatim-in-spirit. The sixth, YAGNI, appeared nowhere else — it moves to
the Exploring approaches list where designs get shaped; the recap section
goes.

* refactor(skills): drop Remember recap from writing-plans

All four lines restate the Overview (DRY/YAGNI/TDD/frequent commits),
Task Structure (exact paths, commands with expected output), and No
Placeholders (complete code in every step).

* refactor(skills): drop The Bottom Line recap from writing-skills

Restates the Iron Law, the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR mapping, and the
TDD-for-docs framing, all stated in full earlier in the file.

* refactor(skills): drop The Bottom Line recap from receiving-code-review

Restates the evaluate-don't-obey frame, verification rule, and
no-performative-agreement rule, each detailed earlier at point of use.
The Common Mistakes table stays: it is the skill's one compact guard
table, the class this cleanup standardizes toward rather than deletes.

* refactor(skills): fold TDD Why Order Matters rebuttals into rationalization table

The eval verdict on this cut: deleting Why Order Matters and trusting the
compressed one-line table rows measurably degrades test-first behavior under
the exact pressure the section rebutted ("just write it, tests after") —
control 8/10 → treatment 5/10 at n=10, corroborated on both Claude and Codex.
Normal TDD triggering did not move (PPPPP → PPPPP both arms); the damage is
purely the pressure case.

So instead of trusting the compressed rows, fold the section's five prose
rebuttals into their Common Rationalizations rows so each row carries the
argument, not just the excuse label:

- "I'll test after" — passing immediately proves nothing (wrong thing /
  implementation-not-behavior / missed edge; you never saw it fail).
- "Already manually tested" — ad-hoc, no record, can't re-run, forgotten
  under pressure.
- "Deleting X hours is wasteful" — sunk cost; rewrite-high-confidence vs
  bolt-tests-on-after-low-confidence.
- "TDD will slow me down" — TDD is the pragmatic path; shortcuts mean
  debugging in production.
- "Tests after achieve same goals (spirit not ritual)" — what-does vs
  what-should; biased by the code you wrote; coverage without proof.

Still removes the 50-line section (~200 words / 45 lines net); the
arguments survive where an agent hits them mid-rationalization. Revalidate
with the tdd-holds-under-tests-later-pressure probe before merge.

* test: realign antigravity + pi mapping assertions with pruned references

Commit e7ddc25 ('Prune per-harness tool-mapping boilerplate') deliberately
removed the skill-loading explainers and generic action->tool tables from
antigravity-tools.md and pi-tools.md, keeping only the harness-specific
notes (subagent dispatch, task tracking). It did not touch tests/, so two
content-assertion tests kept asserting the removed tokens and now fail on
both dev and main:

  - tests/antigravity/test-antigravity-tools.sh: asserted view_file,
    IsSkillFile, run_command, grep_search (all pruned)
  - tests/pi/test-pi-extension.mjs: asserted read/write/edit/bash (pruned)

Update both to assert only the surviving harness-specific mappings. No
reference or skill content is changed; only the stale test assertions.

* test(pi): scope mapping assertions to the table, not whole file

The pi tokens (subagent, pi-subagents, Task, TODO.md) also appear in the
surrounding prose, so matching the whole file passed even with the mapping
table deleted — the exact regression this test exists to catch. Filter to
table rows (lines starting with '|') so the assertion fails when the table
is gone and passes on dev.

Reported by @muunkky on #1987 (approach from #1983); verified failing-first
by stripping the table rows from pi-tools.md.

* docs: fix dead references to pruned claude-code-tools.md/copilot-tools.md

e7ddc25 deleted claude-code-tools.md and copilot-tools.md but left
writing-skills and the porting guide's reference-integration table
pointing at them. State the current architecture instead: Claude Code's
personal-skills path inline, and "no adapter file needed" for the
harnesses that ride the Claude Code-compatible tool surface.

Reported by @rasibintang (#1969, with a fix proposed in #1970).

Fixes #1969

* docs(brainstorming): correct Copilot CLI backgrounding guidance for Windows

* docs(specs): SDD plan-scoped workspace design

The .superpowers/sdd workspace has no plan identity and no end-of-life:
follow-up plans in the same worktree read the previous plan's ledger as
their own progress, and artifacts leak into git (observed in serf, three
contamination rounds and ad-hoc progress-p2/p3 workarounds). Structural
fix: per-plan workspace subdirs, ledger names its plan, delete the
workspace when the final review is clean.

* docs(plans): SDD plan-scoped workspace implementation plan

Five tasks: RED baseline eval (writing-skills Iron Law — before any
skill edit), plan-scoped scripts via TDD, SKILL.md durable-progress
rewrite with mismatch guard and end-of-plan cleanup, GREEN eval with
refinement loop, consistency sweep. Eval = 5 fresh sonnet subagents per
scenario per arm, hand-scored.

* docs(plans): fixture v2 — real cited commits, matched task counts

Fixture v1 tripped the Task 1 STOP gate for the right reason: its
ledgers cited fabricated hashes, so RED agents dismissed them via git
forensics (S1 passed for the wrong mechanism, the S2 resume control
failed 5/5). v2 executes plan A's tasks as real commits, gives both
plans five tasks so numbering is ambiguous, adds a symmetric
resume-uncertainty line to the scenario prompt, hard-stops if the S2
control fails twice, and drops rm -rf from cleanup (hook-gated here).

* docs(plans): re-scope eval per maintainer decision — RED compiled, GREEN measures cost

Three RED rounds (25 reps, three framings incl. faithful compaction
resume) never reproduced blind stale-ledger adoption: sonnet controllers
forensically refuse foreign ledgers, spending 6-13 tool calls per resume
doing it. Jesse approved shipping the full change with the eval re-scoped
to what is true: Task 1 compiles the existing RED evidence, Task 4 runs
GREEN on a truthful v3 fixture (real implementations, rotating authors)
with an S2 released-text control, measuring regression safety and the
disambiguation-cost delta instead of an error rate.

* docs(specs): record eval re-scope — blind adoption did not reproduce, claims narrowed

25/25 baseline reps refused the stale foreign ledger via git forensics;
the spec's evaluation section now states the honest claims: structural
fix + measured disambiguation-cost delta + same-plan-resume regression
gate, shipping with explicit maintainer sign-off in place of a failing
S1 baseline.

* eval(sdd): RED baseline — 25/25 controllers refuse stale ledgers, at a forensic cost

* feat(sdd): plan-scoped workspace — one .superpowers/sdd/<plan> dir per plan

sdd-workspace now requires the plan file and resolves
.superpowers/sdd/<plan-basename>/; task-brief and review-package write
into their plan's directory (review-package gains PLAN_FILE as its first
argument). Follow-up plans in the same working tree can no longer collide
with a previous plan's briefs, reports, or ledger.

* feat(sdd): plan-scoped durable progress — ledger names its plan, workspace dies at plan end

The start-of-skill ledger check is now scoped to the plan's own
workspace and keyed to the ledger's first line. Baseline eval (25/25
reps) showed controllers already refuse foreign ledgers — at a cost of
6-13 tool calls of cross-plan forensics per resume; plan-scoping makes
the answer structural instead. The workspace is deleted once the final
review is clean — git history is the durable record.

* eval(sdd): GREEN results — plan-scoped resolution replaces cross-plan forensics

* chore(sdd): consistency sweep for plan-scoped workspace signatures

* fix(hooks): dispatch the SessionStart hook via Git Bash on Windows

The SessionStart command string starts with a quoted path, which breaks
both Windows shells Claude Code may hand it to: PowerShell parses the
leading quoted string as an expression and dies on the next bareword
('Unexpected token session-start', #1751), and cmd.exe's /c quote rule
drops the outer quotes when the path contains a metacharacter, so a
profile dir like C:\Users\Name(External) truncates the command at the
'(' (#1918). Either way the bootstrap silently never loads.

Declare shell: "bash" on the hook. Claude Code >= 2.1.81 then resolves
Git for Windows and runs the polyglot's bash path directly — the same
route it already picks when it detects Git Bash — and when Git Bash is
missing it surfaces an actionable install prompt instead of a parser
error. Older versions ignore the unknown key and behave exactly as
before (verified live on 2.0.77 and 2.1.80).

Verified end-to-end with real claude sessions: Linux (hook fires,
bootstrap injected), Windows 11 + Git Bash under a path containing
'(' and a space (fires, 3276-char context), and Windows 11 without
Git Bash (actionable error replaces the #1751 ParserError, reproduced
verbatim as control).

Fixes #1751
Fixes #1918

* docs(windows): document shell:bash hook dispatch and the PowerShell/CMD fallback hazards

* fix(codex): make package script and its test portable beyond macOS/bsdtar

The packaging pipeline only worked on a Mac with default umask, for
three stacked reasons:

- The deterministic-metadata tar flags (--uid/--gid/--uname/--gname)
  are bsdtar spellings; GNU tar rejects them, so the tar.gz archive
  step died on Linux. Detect the tar flavor and use --owner=:0
  --group=:0 --numeric-owner on GNU tar, which writes byte-identical
  ustar headers (uid/gid 0, empty uname/gname).
- Staged file modes depended on two umasks canceling out: git archive
  masks entry modes with tar.umask (git default 0002 -> 775), and the
  unflagged tar extraction re-masked with the process umask (022 on
  macOS -> 755, but 002 elsewhere -> 775). Pin tar.umask=0022 on the
  archive call and extract with -p so staged modes are canonical
  755/644 on every machine.
- The test's timestamp assertion parsed bsdtar's -tv column layout and
  expected epoch 0 rendered in a US timezone ("Dec 31 1969"); GNU tar
  uses different columns and UTC hosts render "1970-01-01". Assert
  mtime == 0 via python3 tarfile instead, matching how the test
  already checks zip timestamps.

tests/codex/test-package-codex-plugin.sh now passes on Linux/GNU tar;
the bsdtar branch preserves the exact flags that passed on macOS.

* fix(tests): stop the SDD skill test flaking on timing and prose case

tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development.sh failed
intermittently for two independent reasons:

- Budget mismatch: the file runs 9 prompts with a 90s timeout each
  (810s worst case) inside the runner's 600s per-file ceiling, so slow
  backend days produced spurious timeouts. Raise the runner default to
  900s and fix the help text, which claimed the default was 300.
- Case-sensitive prose matching: the assert helpers grepped free-form
  model output case-sensitively, but models capitalize the skill's own
  headings — observed failures include "Do Not Trust the Report"
  missing pattern "not trust" and a structured answer missing
  "First:.*spec.*compliance". Match case-insensitively in
  assert_contains/assert_not_contains/assert_count/assert_order, widen
  two Test 5 keyword patterns to phrasings observed in real runs, and
  make assert_order dump the output on failure the way assert_contains
  already does, so the next flake is diagnosable.

Observed 3 failures across 4 runs before the change (timeout, two
distinct pattern misses); 3/3 consecutive full runs pass after it.

* docs(specs): SDD fix-loop redesign design spec

Review-fix loop gets resume-the-implementer semantics, scoped
re-reviews, a five-round circuit breaker, and controller adjudication
at trip. SKILL.md reorganizes by lifecycle; Red Flags converts to a
rationalization table. Brainstormed with Jesse 2026-07-15.

* docs(plans): SDD fix-loop redesign implementation plan

Eight tasks across two repos: new re-review template, template/reference
alignment, full SKILL.md lifecycle restructure with move map, two
seeded-ledger fixture helpers, three quorum scenarios, and the RED/GREEN/
regression live-run campaign.

* feat(sdd): add scoped re-review prompt template

* feat(sdd): align templates and codex reference with resume-based fix rounds

* feat(sdd): lifecycle restructure with resume-based fix loop, five-round breaker, and rationalization table

* docs(using-superpowers): drop dangling subagent-support anchor (#2010)

The prune in e7ddc25e removed the `## Subagent support` section from
antigravity-tools.md but left the inline cross-reference to it in the
dispatch table, so `[Subagent support](#subagent-support)` resolves to
nothing. An agent following the pointer to learn the difference between
the `self` and `research` subagent types lands nowhere.

Drop the dangling parenthetical. The guidance it pointed at survives in
the same table cell -- `self` for full-capability work, `research` for
read-only -- so no content is lost and the row still answers the
question the removed section answered.

gemini-tools.md carries the same cross-reference but retains its
`## Subagent support` heading, so its link is valid and is left alone.

* fix(systematic-debugging): match find -path ./ prefix in find-polluter.sh (#2011)

find . emits ./-prefixed paths, so -path "src/**/*.test.ts" matched
nothing; wc -l on empty stdin then lied as "Found 1". Fixes #2008.

Co-authored-by: arimu1 <19286898+arimu1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* fix(systematic-debugging): find-polluter accepts ./-prefixed patterns and matches top-level tests

Follow-up to #2011 (which fixed the ./-prefix mismatch for the documented
pattern form): strip a leading ./ from the caller's pattern instead of
double-prefixing it into a never-matching ././ form, and also match the
pattern with '**/' collapsed, since find -path cannot match '**/' against
zero directory levels and silently skipped files directly under the base
directory (src/top.test.ts vs src/**/*.test.ts).

Adds a deterministic test suite for the script with a stubbed npm.

* fix(finishing): check in with human partner when worktree removal hits untracked files

git worktree remove refuses when the tree holds modified or untracked
files, and the skill gave no guidance for that refusal — the natural
agent response was --force, permanently destroying files that exist
nowhere else (uncommitted plans, notes, scratch work). Reported twice
from real sessions (#2016's plan loss, #1223's dirty-tree ambiguity).

Step 6 now treats the refusal as a stop-and-ask moment: show the
untracked files, offer commit / relocate / delete, and only remove the
worktree after the human partner chooses. Adds a matching rationalization
row so --force-as-cleanup is named as the failure it is.

* feat(hermes): Hermes Agent harness support, rebased to a Hermes-only diff

Rebase of PR #1922 onto current dev: the ~14 files of v6.1.0-era
codex/release drift are dropped, the porting-guide edits (stale against
the post-prune rewrite, no Hermes content) are dropped, and the Hermes
surface is kept intact: .hermes-plugin/ (on_session_start bootstrap
injection), tests/hermes/ (20 tests, passing), docs/README.hermes.md,
references/hermes-tools.md, the Platform Adaptation row, README section,
and Python ignores.

Known open items from review, unchanged by this rebase: the injection
mechanism uses ctx.inject_message from on_session_start, which the
official plugin guide does not document (pre_llm_call returning
{"context": ...} is the sanctioned path), skills are not registered via
ctx.register_skill, and the acceptance transcript predates the fix.

Co-authored-by: kumarabd <kumarabd@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(hermes): working bootstrap injection via pre_llm_call + native skill registration

Empirical findings from the quorum eval bring-up (superpowers-evals
docs/experiments/2026-07-23-hermes-target-bringup.md):

- ctx.inject_message exists but returns False when called from
  on_session_start — nothing reaches the model. The documented path,
  a pre_llm_call hook returning {"context": ...} on is_first_turn,
  verifiably delivers (probe model echoed an injected codeword).
- ctx.register_skill requires a pathlib.Path; passing a str raises
  AttributeError inside hermes, which silently disables the entire
  plugin (no log line anywhere). This also means any exception in
  register() is invisible — keep register() failure-proof.
- Registered skills are namespaced by plugin name: models invoke
  skill_view("superpowers:brainstorming") and receive the stock
  SKILL.md — verified live on GLM 5.2, both install layouts.

The plugin now: resolves skills/ for both the git-clone layout
(.hermes-plugin/ and skills/ as siblings) and a flattened install,
raising loudly when neither matches; registers every stock skill with
Hermes' native loader (no per-harness skill copies); injects the
using-superpowers bootstrap via pre_llm_call on the first turn; and
sources the tool mapping from references/hermes-tools.md instead of
duplicating it. Injected context is transient (API-call time only, never
persisted in the session export) — verification of injection must be
behavioral.

* test(hermes): realign suite with the pre_llm_call mechanism; slim docs to the README section

The 20-test suite still exercised the dead on_session_start/inject_message
mechanism (17 failures against the rewritten plugin). Rewritten for the
real contract: pre_llm_call registration + first-turn-only context return,
register_skill receiving pathlib.Path (the conftest mock now raises on str,
mirroring hermes' AttributeError that silently disables a plugin), both
install layouts resolving skills, loud failure when skills are missing,
tool mapping sourced verbatim from hermes-tools.md, and a bootstrap-size
guard against hermes' 10k-char context spill threshold. 19 tests, passing.

Install docs collapse into the README section per maintainer direction:
docs/README.hermes.md and .hermes-plugin/INSTALL.md are gone; the README
carries the two-line install plus the compaction caveat. plugin.yaml
version aligned to 6.1.1.

* Release v6.2.0: SDD plan-scoped workspace and resume-based fix loop, skills compression sweep, Windows SessionStart fix (#2026)

Release notes for everything on dev since v6.1.1, plus the version bump
to 6.2.0 across all seven declared manifest files (bump-version.sh,
audit clean). Tagging and marketplace publication happen after the
dev -> main merge.

* docs: remove the "We're Hiring" section from the README

The community engineer role has a candidate on trial, so the posting no
longer needs to be at the top of the README.

* feat(brainstorming): three-path router — ceremony scales, approval never does

Spike / bounded / architectural classification said out loud, one-way
upgrade ratchet, approval gate on every path. The measured pathology:
the absolute hard-gate wording forced bounded tasks into the full
two-document ritual 5/5 while a no-guidance control differentiated
paths natively.

* fix(sdd): implementers never dispatch subagents

Depth-2 worker-spawned reviewers were 9/9 same-task duplicate reviews
across four corpora in the codex-efficiency eval campaign.

* fix(brainstorming): bounded-path approval is a hard stop

Live ceremony battery: bounded reps produced zero doc ritual (the
measured win) but 2/3 implemented before any approval turn; the
bounded path now states the stop explicitly.

* fix(codex): correct multi-agent guidance against Codex source

Five claims contradicted by the Codex CLI source (V2 has no
close_agent; followup_task always reaches a child; role files attach
via agent_type; full-history forks accept model/effort; V2 spawn
allowlist). Citations: superpowers-autoresearch
docs/2026-07-29-codex-multiagent-v2-capabilities.md.

* fix(sdd): reviewers never dispatch subagents either

The first fix-cycle battery moved the depth-2 leak from implementers
(9/9 baseline -> 0/6) to a final reviewer that spawned two
sub-reviewers; the contract now reaches every dispatched role.

* fix(brainstorming): bounded means existing code in this repo, not a familiar app genre

Triggering battery: Claude Code classified a brand-new project bounded
3/3 by reading 'existing, understood flow' as genre familiarity — once
while explicitly noting the repo was empty. Gemini routed the same
prompt architectural 3/3.

* fix(codex): event-driven waiting instead of short polls

60-78% of wait_agent calls timed out across every measured corpus;
waits are event subscriptions, so one long wait replaces dozens of
polls at identical wake latency.

* fix(sdd): controllers wait long or not at all

Docs-only wait guidance in the platform reference changed nothing
(65.1% vs 67.1% baseline wait-timeout rate); the discipline now lives
in the controller loop the session actually re-reads.

* fix(sdd,codex): bounded wait stretches with reconciliation

Round 2 proved the long-wait mechanism (65.1%->0.0% timeouts) but
20-38 min silent waits starved graders and let 1/51 children vanish;
bounded 5-10 min stretches with a status line and list_agents
reconcile keep the efficiency and restore observability.

* fix(codex): explicit model+effort on every spawn, config backstop

Depth-2 child-issued spawns omitted model 2/2 at CLI 0.146; model
without reasoning_effort resets effort to the model default.

* docs: codex-efficiency fix-cycle spec and plan (campaign record)

* fix(sdd): rule and continue — non-catastrophic conflicts get ledgered rulings, not blocking questions

A donated session sat dormant 8h48m waiting for a plan-conflict answer
that cost ~zero tokens to decide. Wrong-ruling rework is bounded;
stalls are not. This encodes the never-stall doctrine: plan conflicts,
ambiguities, and cap exceptions get a controller ruling recorded in
the ledger and work proceeds; only irreversible/destructive actions,
security-sensitive actions, out-of-worktree side effects (merge/push/
publish), and totally-broken plans remain hard stops. Rulings surface
in the Finish report instead of as mid-run questions.

Evals: 3/3 no-stall vs control 3/3 stall-at-preflight on a
seeded-conflict SDD plan; catastrophic guard 5/5 (every rep reaching a
seeded DROP TABLE step refused it); re-validated 3/3 after rebase onto
the current fix-PR text; composes cleanly with the evidence-bearing
preflight treatment.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185AJr98gHx5EmwqNeft4Sy

* fix(sdd): batch small same-shape tasks into one dispatch

Plans sometimes enumerate many tiny, same-shape edits (one-line fixes,
constant changes, a field added across files) as separate tasks. The
current loop dispatches a fresh implementer plus review per task, so a
12-micro-task plan costs ~24 subagent seats for what one subagent could
do in a single pass. In controlled evals on a micro-task plan, batching
cut cost 73% and dispatches 87% with better completion than control; on
a 5-non-trivial-task plan the rule correctly never batched (dispatch
counts and completion identical to control).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185AJr98gHx5EmwqNeft4Sy

* fix(sdd): preflight emits its pairwise checks as a ledger table and rules on what it surfaces

The pre-Task-1 conflict scan currently permits 'the scan is clean' with
no evidence the scan happened — mined sessions show controllers skipping
straight to dispatch and plan conflicts surfacing mid-execution as
blocking questions. Requiring the scan to emit one row per task pair
sharing a file/interface and one row per task's self-consistency turns
the claim into an artifact; in controlled evals the table appeared 3/3
with conflicts surfaced pre-dispatch, and the mechanism held 3/3 when
composed with the never-stall ruling change (#2077).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185AJr98gHx5EmwqNeft4Sy

* fix(planning): the spec travels with the plan — Spec: header pointer + SDD reads it at setup

In controlled evals, an identical seeded-incoherence plan yielded 0-1/5
correct conflict resolutions when executed specless (controllers ruled
the conflicts 'internally explained') and 4-5/5 with the spec merely
present and named — even with no other skill-text changes. Cross-task
coherence turns out to be adjudicable only against ground truth above
the plan; this change makes that ground truth travel with the plan.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185AJr98gHx5EmwqNeft4Sy

* fix(sdd): one Ruling: token everywhere, exhaustive finish roll-up

The breaker's two ledger formats wrote lowercase 'ruling' (parked
findings, load-bearing adjudications), so the Finish section's
collect-every-`Ruling:`-line step missed exactly the rulings made under
the most pressure. Field evidence from an independent eval rep: a
breaker-cap run adjudicated correctly, wrote everything to the
plan-scoped ledger, deleted the workspace at finish, and left no durable
trace of the adjudication.

Capitalize the two breaker formats to the canonical token, and make the
finish roll-up explicitly exhaustive across preflight, parked, and
breaker rulings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(sdd): batch reviews check the diff against the brief's file list

Batching moves N edits under one review, which changes the review's
failure profile: an implementer that silently skips one file of twelve
produces a diff full of correct, uniform edits — nothing conspicuous is
missing, and no seat in the pipeline was assigned to notice. The single
combined review is the only net for a dropped edit, but the reviewer
template never told it to count.

The batch brief already lists every file with its change, so the reviewer
reconciles the diff against that list file by file; a listed file with no
hunk is a Missing finding regardless of how clean the rest of the batch
looks. Conditional on a multi-file brief, so single-task reviews are
unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(sdd): task reviewers re-read illegible evidence instead of re-running to regenerate it

Interrogation of reviewers who bypassed test-evidence leases showed a
convergent driver: when the report or receipt looked truncated or
couldn't be located, re-running the suite felt cheaper than re-reading —
evidence got regenerated instead of read. This paragraph names that
moment: re-read at the stated path, report a genuine gap to the
controller, and never re-run to regenerate what wasn't read.

Battery: 0/31 reviewer re-runs across 4 treatment reps vs 7/~59
reviewers in 5/8 control reps on the same scenario and classifier.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185AJr98gHx5EmwqNeft4Sy

* Moves Community up, and adds ToC.

* chore(hermes): align plugin version with dev

Update the Hermes plugin manifest from 6.1.1 to 6.2.0 so PR #2025 matches the current release version at the tip of origin/dev.\n\nThis intentionally does not change the version bump tooling. The existing release script supports JSON manifests only; YAML support will be handled separately on its own branch.

* fix(writing-skills): run graphviz without a shell in render-graphs.js

The `dot` availability check shelled out to `which dot`, which is not a
command on Windows, so render-graphs.js reported graphviz as missing on
Windows even when it was installed. Replace it with a direct `dot -V`
probe via execFileSync.

Also switch the SVG render call from execSync to execFileSync('dot',
['-Tsvg']). Behavior is identical on macOS/Linux — the diagram source
was already passed via stdin, never interpolated into the command — but
running the binary directly removes the shell entirely.

* test(writing-skills): cover render-graphs execution

* fix(finishing): name the actual files in the refusal prompt

`git status --porcelain` collapses a wholly-untracked directory to a single
`?? docs/` line. In the shape of the incident this step exists for (#2016 — an
uncommitted plan document under an untracked `docs/` tree), the file list we
show the human partner therefore names no file at all:

    $ git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain
    ?? docs/
    $ git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uall
    ?? docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-04-csv-export-rollout.md

Both forms produce identical (empty) output on a clean worktree, so this adds
no over-trigger surface.

Found while running this PR's behavioral micro-tests. Every treatment agent
dug past `?? docs/` unprompted and named the document, so the step did work —
but on the agent's own initiative rather than because the text asked for it.
That initiative is not reliable one tier down: Claude Haiku 4.5 on the control
arm failed for exactly this shape, asking a question that never named the file
and then deciding for the human when they deferred. Nothing in the prior
wording stopped a treatment agent from relaying `?? docs/` verbatim and
satisfying the letter of the instruction.

Re-ran the treatment cells against this amended text — Opus pass (refusal
fired, named the file), Haiku 4.5 pass (named the file) — no regression.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: design Hermes version-bump wiring

Document the agreed follow-up to PR #2025 on a branch based on its merged dev commit. The design registers the Hermes YAML manifest, keeps jq for existing JSON files, and uses Mike Farah yq v4 for a narrow top-level YAML field rather than adding a Bash parser.\n\nDefine focused failure behavior and behavioral tests while explicitly excluding nested YAML, Hermes runtime changes, and unrelated release-script refactors. This captures Drew's request to keep the implementation small and avoid process or abstraction overhead.

* docs: reduce Hermes version-bump design

Incorporate the adversarial design review without turning the Hermes wiring follow-up into a general release-script refactor. Keep the existing jq path, add Mike Farah yq v4 only for .yaml, and retain one read-only preflight to prevent deterministic partial bumps.\n\nReduce the test contract to three behavioral cases and explicitly defer .yml support, nested YAML, rollback machinery, audit/status redesign, exhaustive failure matrices, and the separately discovered JSON-expression issue. This follows Drew's direction to avoid ceremony and overengineering.

* docs: plan Hermes version-bump wiring

Record Drew's approved reduced design after the second staff review. Limit preflight to the mutating bump path, cover audit's independent read path, and require byte-for-byte proof that deterministic YAML failures cannot partially update earlier JSON manifests.

Provide one TDD implementation task for the Hermes registry entry, jq/yq dispatch, focused preflight, and three behavioral checks. Explicitly defer rollback, audit-status changes, nested YAML, runtime changes, and broader release-tool refactoring.

* fix(release): wire Hermes into version bumps

Register the Hermes YAML manifest alongside the existing JSON manifests. Route manifest reads and writes by extension through jq or Mike Farah yq v4, with field names and values passed as data.

Preflight every present manifest before the mutating bump loop so a deterministic YAML read failure cannot leave earlier JSON manifests partially updated. Cover check, audit, bump, registry wiring, and byte-for-byte no-partial-write behavior with one focused fixture test.

* docs: add Grok Build CLI to README.md

* feat: add Devin CLI support

Devin CLI's `devin plugins install obra/superpowers` fails today because the
repo has no `.devin-plugin/plugin.json` manifest. Add the manifest (skills are
auto-discovered from the co-located skills/ directory), a Devin tool mapping
linked from using-superpowers' Platform Adaptation section, a README install
section, version tracking in .version-bump.json, a Codex-sync exclude for the
new dotdir, and a CI-safe test mirroring the kimi/antigravity test style.

Bootstrap rides Devin's native skill surfacing: every installed skill's
name + description is injected into the system prompt at session start with a
standing instruction to invoke matching skills via the native skill tool.
Acceptance test ("Let's make a react todo list") passes in a clean session:
using-superpowers and brainstorming auto-trigger before any code is written.

* Drop devin-tools.md — not needed for correct operation

Re-ran the clean-session acceptance test with the mapping file and the
SKILL.md Platform Adaptation pointer removed: using-superpowers and
brainstorming still auto-trigger first, and the full workflow chain
(writing-plans, executing-plans, TDD, verification) resolves every action
to Devin's native tools. Devin CLI's own system prompt already documents
its tools (skill invocation, subagent profiles, todo tracking, question
prompts), so the mapping was redundant. Test now validates the manifest only.

* docs: streamline README getting started navigation

Remove the redundant Quickstart entry and section now that the README has a table of contents. Rename the Installation label in the table of contents to Getting Started while retaining the existing installation anchor and section heading.

* docs: keep Hermes in installation navigation

Add Hermes Agent to the installation entries in the table of contents. The removed Quickstart section was the README's only direct link to that existing installation section, so preserving the link avoids a navigation regression.

* docs: release notes for v6.3.0

* chore: bump version to 6.3.0

---------

Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drew@primeradiant.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Ada Sen <ada@sen.dev>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav Dubey <gauravdubey0107@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: arimu1 <19286898+arimu1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Rada <markrada26@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dev_Hakaze <af.nawfal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: kumarabd <kumarabd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drew@ritter.dev>
Co-authored-by: Kattni <kattni@kattni.com>
Co-authored-by: Georgii Perepechko <georgiiperepechko@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Caio Lopes <caiodesalopes@gmail.com>
2026-08-12 09:53:21 -07:00
Jesse Vincent 41cdb703de Merge main into dev: reconcile We're Hiring removal (44c9b2d) with dev's README rework
# Conflicts:
#	README.md
2026-08-12 05:08:27 +00:00
Jesse Vincent d4e3c1cb8c chore: bump version to 6.3.0 2026-08-12 05:04:54 +00:00
Jesse Vincent 89d36fe961 docs: release notes for v6.3.0 2026-08-12 04:50:23 +00:00
Drew Ritter 034958f842 docs: keep Hermes in installation navigation
Add Hermes Agent to the installation entries in the table of contents. The removed Quickstart section was the README's only direct link to that existing installation section, so preserving the link avoids a navigation regression.
2026-08-07 17:37:17 -07:00
Drew Ritter 824aabcb21 docs: streamline README getting started navigation
Remove the redundant Quickstart entry and section now that the README has a table of contents. Rename the Installation label in the table of contents to Getting Started while retaining the existing installation anchor and section heading.
2026-08-07 17:37:17 -07:00
Jesse Vincent 44c9b2d6e8 docs: remove the "We're Hiring" section from the README
The community engineer role has a candidate on trial, so the posting no
longer needs to be at the top of the README.
2026-07-28 12:25:36 -07:00
34 changed files with 3430 additions and 122 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"source": "./",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
"email": "jesse@fsck.com"
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"description": "An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works: planning, TDD, debugging, and collaboration workflows.",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
"name": "superpowers",
"displayName": "Superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
"email": "jesse@fsck.com"
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"description": "An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works: planning, TDD, debugging, and collaboration workflows.",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: superpowers
version: 6.2.0
version: 6.3.0
description: Superpowers skills and workflow bootstrap for Hermes Agent
author: obra
provides_hooks:
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"description": "An agentic skills framework and software development methodology.",
"author": {
"name": "Jesse Vincent",
+109 -107
View File
@@ -1,128 +1,130 @@
# Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
# Prime Radiant Community Code of Conduct
## Our Pledge
We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our
community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender
identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status,
nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity
and orientation.
We pledge to make our community welcoming, safe, and equitable for all.
We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming,
diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
We are committed to fostering an environment that respects and promotes the dignity, rights, and contributions of all individuals, regardless of characteristics including race, ethnicity, caste, color, age, physical characteristics, neurodiversity, disability, sex or gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, language, philosophy or religion, national or social origin, socio-economic position, level of education, or other status. The same privileges of participation are extended to everyone who participates in good faith and in accordance with this Covenant.
## Our Standards
The guidelines within and enforcement of the Prime Radiant Community Code of Conduct apply equally to everyone participating in the Prime Radiant community, including members of the Prime Radiant team.
Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our
community include:
## Encouraged Behaviors
* Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
* Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
* Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
* Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes,
and learning from the experience
* Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the
overall community
While acknowledging differences in social norms, we all strive to meet our community's expectations for positive behavior. We also understand that our words and actions may be interpreted differently than we intend based on culture, background, or native language.
Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
With these considerations in mind, we agree to behave mindfully toward each other and act in ways that center our shared values, including:
* The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or
advances of any kind
* Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
* Public or private harassment
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email
address, without their explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
professional setting
1. Respecting the **purpose of our community**, our activities, and our ways of gathering.
2. Engaging **kindly and honestly** with others.
3. Respecting **different viewpoints** and experiences.
4. **Taking responsibility** for our actions and contributions.
5. Gracefully giving and accepting **constructive feedback**.
6. Committing to **repairing harm** when it occurs.
7. Behaving in other ways that promote and sustain the **well-being of our community**.
## Enforcement Responsibilities
## Restricted Behaviors
Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of
acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive,
or harmful.
We agree to restrict the following behaviors in our community. Instances, threats, and promotion of these behaviors are violations of this Code of Conduct.
Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation
decisions when appropriate.
1. **Harassment.** Violating explicitly expressed boundaries or engaging in unnecessary personal attention after any clear request to stop.
2. **Character attacks.** Making insulting, demeaning, or pejorative comments directed at a community member or group of people.
3. **Inciting conflict.** Deliberately engaging in discussions meant to cause arguments or a hostile environment.
4. **Stereotyping or discrimination.** Characterizing anyones personality or behavior on the basis of immutable identities or traits.
5. **Sexualization.** Behaving in a way that would generally be considered inappropriately intimate in the context or purpose of the community.
6. **Violating confidentiality.** Sharing or acting on someone's personal or private information without their permission.
7. **Endangerment.** Causing, encouraging, or threatening violence or other harm toward any person or group.
8. Behaving in other ways that **threaten the well-being** of our community.
### Other Restrictions
1. **Divisive topics.** Discussing inflammatory topics that are unrelated to the community as a whole.
2. **Offensive content.** Any text or image that is offensive or violates any of the other restricted behaviors, including as part of a username, profile, status, avatar, or other publicly displayed identifier.
3. **Misleading identity.** Impersonating someone else for any reason, misrepresenting yourself as associated with Prime Radiant or any company, or pretending to be someone else to evade enforcement actions.
4. **Failing to credit sources.** Not properly crediting the sources of content you contribute, or representing work created by someone else as your own.
5. **Advertising and promotional materials.** Sharing marketing or other commercial content, invite links, or irrelevant self-promotion, as well as buying, trading, or asking for donations.
6. **Spam posts.** Spamming, including, but not limited to, posting a flood of messages in a short period of time, irrelevant content, or excessive links.
7. **Unsolicited mentions and direct messages.** Engaging in harassment by excessively mentioning someone by username or replying, or direct messaging someone without explicit invitation.
8. **Irresponsible communication.** Failing to responsibly present content which includes, links, or describes any other restricted behaviors.
9. Other conduct that could reasonably be considered **unprofessional** or **inappropriate**.
## Reporting an Issue
Tensions can occur between community members even when they are trying their best to collaborate. Not every conflict represents a code of conduct violation, and this Code of Conduct reinforces encouraged behaviors and norms that can help avoid conflicts and minimize harm. You are welcome to report concerns, even if they seem minor, as they can be helpful in identifying patterns of behavior that may not be concerning in isolation, but when viewed collectively may be more significant.
When an incident does occur, it is important to report it promptly. To report a possible violation anywhere in the community, email [conduct@primeradiant.com](mailto:conduct@primeradiant.com). On the Prime Radiant Discord server, you can mention `@moderators` in a public channel, or report via a support ticket, created through the `#support-ticket` channel. In the event that you need to report a member of the Prime Radiant team, you can contact Kattni at [kattni@primeradiant.com](mailto:kattni@primeradiant.com) or Drew at [drew@primeradiant.com](mailto:drew@primeradiant.com).
Community Moderators take reports of violations seriously and will make every effort to respond in a timely manner. They will investigate all reports of code of conduct violations, reviewing messages, logs, and recordings, or interviewing witnesses and other participants. Community Moderators will keep investigation and enforcement actions as transparent as possible while prioritizing safety and confidentiality. In order to honor these values, enforcement actions are carried out in private with the involved parties, but communicating to the whole community may be part of a mutually agreed upon resolution. If moderators determine that a public statement needs to be made, the identities of all victims and reporters will remain confidential unless those individuals instruct otherwise.
In your report, please include:
- **Your contact info** so the team can get in touch with you if they need to follow up.
- **Names (real, nicknames, or pseudonyms) of any individuals involved.** If there were other witnesses besides you, please try to include them as well.
- **When and where the incident occurred.** Please be as specific as possible.
- **Your account of what occurred.** If there is a publicly available record (e.g. a Discord or GitHub message) please include a link.
- **Any extra context** you believe existed for the incident.
- **If you believe this incident is ongoing.**
- **If you believe any member of the team has a conflict of interest** in adjudicating the incident.
- **What, if any, corrective response** you believe would be appropriate.
- **Any other information** you believe the team should have.
Moderators are obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter and details of an incident.
## Report Followup
You will receive a response acknowledging receipt of your report within 24 business hours.
If a member of the team is one of the named parties, they will not be included in any discussions, and will not be provided with any confidential details from the reporter.
If anyone on the moderation team believes they have a conflict of interest in adjudicating on a reported issue, they will inform the other team members, and recuse themselves from any discussion about the issue. Following this declaration, they will not be provided with any confidential details from the reporter.
The team will immediately review the incident and determine:
- What happened.
- Whether this event constitutes a code of conduct violation.
- Who the reported person is.
- Whether this is an ongoing situation, or if there is a threat to anyone's physical safety.
If this is determined to be an ongoing incident or a threat to physical safety, the team's immediate priority will be to protect everyone involved. This means they may delay an official response until they believe that the situation has concluded and that everyone is physically safe.
The moderation team will respond within one week to the person who filed the report with either a resolution or an explanation of why the situation is not yet resolved.
Once the team has determined their final action, they'll contact the reporter to let them know what action (if any) they'll be taking. They'll take into account feedback from the reporter on the appropriateness of the response, but do not guarantee they'll act on it.
Finally, to maintain transparency in the reporting and enforcement process, whenever possible, a public transparency report of the incident will be made. A public report may not be made if the specifics of the incident do not allow the team to preserve anonymity, or if there is potential for ongoing harm.
## Addressing and Repairing Harm
If an investigation by the Community Moderators finds that this Code of Conduct has been violated, the following enforcement ladder may be used to determine how best to repair harm, based on the incident's impact on the individuals involved and the community as a whole. Depending on the severity of a violation, lower rungs on the ladder may be skipped.
1) Warning
1) Event: A violation involving a single incident or series of incidents.
2) Consequence: A private, written warning from the Community Moderators.
3) Repair: Examples of repair include a private written apology, acknowledgement of responsibility, and seeking clarification on expectations.
2) Temporarily Limited Activities
1) Event: A repeated incidence of a violation that previously resulted in a warning, or the first incidence of a more serious violation.
2) Consequence: A private, written warning with a time-limited cooldown period designed to underscore the seriousness of the situation and give the community members involved time to process the incident. The cooldown period may be limited to particular communication channels or interactions with particular community members.
3) Repair: Examples of repair may include making an apology, using the cooldown period to reflect on actions and impact, and being thoughtful about re-entering community spaces after the period is over.
3) Temporary Suspension
1) Event: A pattern of repeated violation which the Community Moderators have tried to address with warnings, or a single serious violation.
2) Consequence: A private written warning with conditions for return from suspension. In general, temporary suspensions give the person being suspended time to reflect upon their behavior and possible corrective actions.
3) Repair: Examples of repair include respecting the spirit of the suspension, meeting the specified conditions for return, and being thoughtful about how to reintegrate with the community when the suspension is lifted.
4) Permanent Ban
1) Event: A pattern of repeated code of conduct violations that other steps on the ladder have failed to resolve, or a violation so serious that the Community Moderators determine there is no way to keep the community safe with this person as a member.
2) Consequence: Access to all community spaces, tools, and communication channels is removed. In general, permanent bans should be rarely used, should have strong reasoning behind them, and should only be resorted to if working through other remedies has failed to change the behavior.
3) Repair: There is no possible repair in cases of this severity.
This enforcement ladder is intended as a guideline. It does not limit the ability of Community Managers to use their discretion and judgment, in keeping with the best interests of our community.
## Scope
This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when
an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces.
Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address,
posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
representative at an online or offline event.
This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, including GitHub and the Prime Radiant Discord server. It also applies when an individual is officially representing the community in public or other spaces. Examples of representing the community include using an official email address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event.
## Enforcement
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at
jesse@primeradiant.com.
All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
reporter of any incident.
## Enforcement Guidelines
Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining
the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:
### 1. Correction
**Community Impact**: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed
unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.
**Consequence**: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing
clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the
behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.
### 2. Warning
**Community Impact**: A violation through a single incident or series
of actions.
**Consequence**: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No
interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with
those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This
includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels
like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or
permanent ban.
### 3. Temporary Ban
**Community Impact**: A serious violation of community standards, including
sustained inappropriate behavior.
**Consequence**: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public
communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or
private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction
with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period.
Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.
### 4. Permanent Ban
**Community Impact**: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community
standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an
individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.
**Consequence**: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within
the community.
Behavior outside of official Prime Radiant spaces may also be considered as supporting evidence for a report if that behavior establishes a pattern, or represents a potential risk to the Prime Radiant community.
## Attribution
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage],
version 2.0, available at
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html.
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 3.0, permanently available at [https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/3/0/](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/3/0/).
Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by [Mozilla's code of conduct
enforcement ladder](https://github.com/mozilla/diversity).
Contributor Covenant is stewarded by the Organization for Ethical Source and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)
[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org
For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are available at
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations.
For answers to common questions about Contributor Covenant, see the FAQ at [https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq). Translations are provided at [https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations). Additional enforcement and community guideline resources can be found at [https://www.contributor-covenant.org/resources](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/resources). The enforcement ladder was inspired by the work of [Mozillas code of conduct team](https://github.com/mozilla/inclusion).
+3 -6
View File
@@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ Superpowers is a complete software development methodology for your coding agent
## Table of Contents
- [Quickstart](#quickstart)
- [How it works](#how-it-works)
- [Commercial Services](#commercial-services)
- [Installation](#installation)
- [Getting Started](#installation)
- [Claude Code](#claude-code)
- [Antigravity](#antigravity)
- [Codex App](#codex-app)
@@ -21,6 +20,7 @@ Superpowers is a complete software development methodology for your coding agent
- [Kimi Code](#kimi-code)
- [OpenCode](#opencode)
- [Pi](#pi)
- [Hermes Agent](#hermes-agent)
- [The Basic Workflow](#the-basic-workflow)
- [Community](#community)
- [What's Inside](#whats-inside)
@@ -30,10 +30,6 @@ Superpowers is a complete software development methodology for your coding agent
- [License](#license)
- [Visual companion telemetry](#visual-companion-telemetry)
## Quickstart
Give your agent Superpowers: [Claude Code](#claude-code), [Antigravity](#antigravity), [Codex App](#codex-app), [Codex CLI](#codex-cli), [Cursor](#cursor), [Devin CLI](#devin-cli), [Factory Droid](#factory-droid), [Gemini CLI](#gemini-cli), [GitHub Copilot CLI](#github-copilot-cli), [Grok Build CLI](#grok-build-cli), [Hermes Agent](#hermes-agent), [Kimi Code](#kimi-code), [OpenCode](#opencode), [Pi](#pi).
## How it works
It starts from the moment you fire up your coding agent. As soon as it sees that you're building something, it *doesn't* just jump into trying to write code. Instead, it steps back and asks you what you're really trying to do.
@@ -298,6 +294,7 @@ Superpowers is built by [Jesse Vincent](https://blog.fsck.com) and the rest of t
**Debugging**
- **systematic-debugging** - 4-phase root cause process (includes root-cause-tracing, defense-in-depth, condition-based-waiting techniques)
- **verification-before-completion** - Ensure it's actually fixed
- **diagnosing-superpowers** - Work out what went wrong in a session, with evidence; export a scrubbed bundle or file an issue
**Collaboration**
- **brainstorming** - Socratic design refinement
+39
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,44 @@
# Superpowers Release Notes
## v6.3.0 (2026-08-12)
### Harness Support
- **Devin CLI**: `devin plugins install obra/superpowers` now works, and skills auto-trigger at session start. (#1995)
- **Hermes Agent**: install from a git clone; skills register with Hermes' native loader and the bootstrap loads on the first turn. (#1922, #2025)
- **Grok Build CLI** added to the install docs. (#1919)
### Brainstorming
- **Ceremony now scales to the task.** Requests are classified as spike, bounded, or architectural; small tasks skip the two-document ritual. Every path still stops for your approval before implementation. (#2063)
### Subagent-Driven Development
- **Controllers no longer stall on plan conflicts.** Non-catastrophic conflicts and ambiguities get a recorded ruling and work continues; only destructive or irreversible actions still stop for a human. One donated session had sat blocked for almost nine hours on a question the controller could have decided. (#2077)
- **The pre-dispatch conflict scan records its checks in the ledger** instead of just asserting the plan is clean. (#2080)
- **Small same-shape tasks batch into one dispatch**, cutting subagent cost sharply on micro-task plans; batch reviews verify every file in the brief made it into the diff. (#2078)
- **Implementers and reviewers may not spawn their own subagents**, which was producing duplicate reviews. (#2059)
- **Plans carry a `Spec:` pointer** and SDD reads the spec at setup, so plan conflicts get resolved against the design instead of guessed at. (#2086)
- Reviewers re-read evidence they find illegible instead of re-running the test suite (#2089), and circuit-breaker rulings now show up in the Finish report.
### Codex
- Subagent waits are event-driven instead of poll-heavy, spawns pin model and reasoning effort explicitly, and the multi-agent reference is corrected against Codex source. (#2060, #2061, #2062)
### Finishing a Development Branch
- **Worktree removal no longer destroys untracked files.** When `git worktree remove` refuses because the tree holds uncommitted work, the skill stops, names the files, and asks — instead of reaching for `--force`. (#2016, #1223, #2024)
### Fixes
- `render-graphs.js` in writing-skills works on Windows.
- Corrected Copilot CLI backgrounding guidance for Windows. (#1929, #2006)
- `bump-version.sh` covers the Hermes manifest.
### Documentation
- README: added a table of contents and reorganized Getting Started.
## v6.2.0 (2026-07-23)
### Subagent-Driven Development
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
@@ -0,0 +1,516 @@
# Diagnosing Superpowers Sessions — Design
Date: 2026-08-27
Status: approved by Jesse (in-session); spec pending review
Branch: `diagnosing-superpowers` off `dev`
## Goal
A core skill, `diagnosing-superpowers`, that a user invokes when a
superpowers session went wrong. It works with the user to pin down the
problem, examines the session transcript(s) on disk, and reports what
happened with evidence. On request it exports a scrubbed bundle that a
remote agent can use to decide whether superpowers itself needs a change,
and it can look for other local sessions that show the same behavior.
The skill reports; it never diagnoses superpowers. Speculating about bugs
in superpowers or proposing changes to superpowers is the remote triager's
job, and the skill says so if asked.
## Scope decisions (settled with Jesse)
- **Pure prose skill for v1.** No shipped scripts. The model does the work,
using subagents aggressively. Deterministic tooling can come later if the
prose version proves the shape.
- **Harness coverage.** Reference docs with real field-level detail exist
only for formats verified against files on disk: Claude Code and Codex.
Every other harness gets a discovery procedure. The running harness is
expected to know its own session store; the skill tells it to use that
knowledge and to say plainly what it could and could not read. No
invented formats.
- **Problem intake first.** The skill opens by asking what the user is
trying to diagnose and works with them until there is a concrete problem
statement. Sweeps run in service of that statement.
- **Quality is judged as process evidence**, against the session's own
commitments (design, plan, acceptance criteria, spec/plan files) and
against what the transcript proves (tests run, verification behind
claims, commits matching claims, review feedback handled). It is not a
code review of the resulting diff.
- **Redaction level is the user's call.** The skill asks, and tells the
user that for a superpowers bug report, more information gives a better
chance of help.
- **Superpowers identity is recorded precisely**: install root actually
loaded, version, git sha if a checkout, and a sha1 for every skill file
the session read or had injected.
- **Skill triggering is a first-class analysis dimension**: what triggered
when, in response to what, and where a skill's own trigger description
matched but nothing fired or fired late.
## Skill layout
```
skills/diagnosing-superpowers/
SKILL.md
references/
claude-code-sessions.md
codex-sessions.md
other-harnesses.md
prompts/
skill-timeline.md
plan-adherence.md
repeated-work.md
stumbles.md
quality-evidence.md
request-conflicts.md
cost-and-time.md
scrub.md
scrub-audit.md
similar-session.md
templates/
case.md
report.md
bundle-README.md
issue.md
tests/diagnosing-superpowers/
test-skill-structure.sh
```
Same shape as `subagent-driven-development`: a lean SKILL.md holding the
workflow, hard rules, and Red Flags; one file per subagent job so each
subagent reads exactly one prompt; reference files loaded only when the
harness matches.
### SKILL.md frontmatter
```
name: diagnosing-superpowers
description: Use when a superpowers session went wrong and the user wants
to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a
skill that didn't fire — or wants to build a bug report for the
superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one
identified by id or path, on any harness.
```
Triggering conditions only; no workflow summary (see `writing-skills`,
Skill Discovery Optimization). SKILL.md stays under 900 words (the structure test enforces it; the repo's process skills run 3504,800 words, and this one has a seven-step workflow):
workflow, hard rules, Red Flags, and pointers. Everything else lives in
the prompt, reference, and template files.
## Workflow
Each step is a todo item when the skill runs.
### 1. Problem intake
Ask one question at a time until the problem is concrete: which session(s),
what the user expected, what actually happened, where they first noticed.
Complaints usually arrive vague ("it took too long", "why did it do this
extra work?", "why is it so expensive?", "what the hell is it doing?");
intake turns each into a statement that names the session, the turn range
if known, and the observable the user cares about (wall-clock, tokens,
repeated actions, a specific unexpected action). Write the agreed
statement to the case file (below). If the user says the goal is a bug
report for superpowers, note that now; it changes the default answer at
export time.
### 2. Locate
Resolve every session the user named to exact paths on disk.
- **Current session.** The model uses its harness's own knowledge of where
it writes transcripts. For Claude Code and Codex the reference file
gives directory layout, how to pick the current session (most recently
modified file for this cwd, confirmed by matching the first user
message), where subagent transcripts live, and which fields carry model,
harness version, skill/plugin attribution, compaction, and errors. For
any other harness, `other-harnesses.md` says: find your session store,
state what you found and how confident you are, and if you cannot find
it, say so and ask the user for the path.
- **Past session.** The user gives an id, a path, a date plus description,
or "the one where X happened". Resolve to exact paths and confirm
identity with the user by quoting the first prompt and timestamp before
analyzing.
- **Subagents.** Enumerate every subagent/sidechain transcript that belongs
to the session and treat them as part of it.
- **Live sessions.** "What is it doing right now" means the session may
still be running and its file mid-write. Read what is there, record the
line count and mtime at read time, and say in coverage notes that the
session was in progress.
- **Host and superpowers identity.** Record OS and version; harness and
version; every model id seen; the superpowers install root the session
actually loaded (marketplace cache and dev checkout can differ), its
version from the manifest, git sha if it is a checkout; a sha1 of every
skill file the session read or had injected, computed from the file as it
exists now, flagged when the file's mtime is newer than the session
because the hash may not match what the session saw; other plugins,
extensions, and MCP servers configured; instruction files present
(CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the like) listed by path only.
- **Everything looked at is reported**: every session id and path, including
candidates rejected as not matching, with the reason.
The workspace is `~/.superpowers/diagnosing-superpowers/<session-id>/`
(home directory, so it never lands in a project tree or a commit). The
skill prints the path in chat as soon as it is created and again in the
report. `case.md` there holds the problem statement, the resolved paths,
the identity facts, and the context-safety rules. Every subagent gets its
path.
### 3. Triage
The controller reads the region of the transcript around the reported
problem itself (using the context-safety rules) and forms a first read.
Then it dispatches the analyst subagents in parallel, one per dimension,
each with the case file path and its prompt file. For long sessions the
controller splits a dimension across turn ranges and merges the results.
Subagents return findings in one shape:
```
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <path:line> — "<short quote>"
turns: <first><last>
confidence: high | medium | low
```
Dimensions and what each looks for:
- **Skill timeline.** Per human turn: which skills and plugins were invoked
(harness attribution fields where they exist, otherwise reads of
`SKILL.md` files), what request preceded the invocation, turns where a
skill's trigger description matched the request but nothing fired, and
late triggers. Also every non-superpowers plugin, skill, agent, or MCP
tool used, and where.
- **Plan adherence.** Recover the plan, spec, design, or todo list the
session committed to; map each step to what happened; flag skipped,
reordered, silently changed, or invented steps. Marks compaction and
resume points because plan drift after them is common.
- **Repeated work.** Same file read or edited many times, same command
re-run, same subagent task re-dispatched, decisions re-derived after
they were already made.
- **Stumbles.** Tool errors, failed commands, retries, reverted edits,
backtracking, user corrections, permission denials, hook failures, API
errors, crashes, context overflow.
- **Quality evidence.** Tests run and their results; "done", "verified",
"passing" claims and whether verification output precedes them; commits
versus what was claimed; review feedback addressed or hand-waved.
- **Request conflicts.** Contradictory user instructions across turns,
instructions conflicting with CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, requests the model
was told to ignore. Only human-typed prompts count as user instructions.
- **Cost and time.** Tokens (input, output, cache) and wall-clock per human
turn, per subagent, and per tool; the largest single tool results;
compaction count and where; idle gaps between events; the turns that
dominate the totals. Claude Code carries per-message `usage`; Codex
emits `token_count` events.
The controller reconciles findings against its own read, drops anything
without a `path:line`, and writes the report.
### 4. Report
`~/.superpowers/diagnosing-superpowers/<session-id>/report.md`, also shown
in chat. Fixed section order so a remote triager can rely on it:
1. **Problem statement** as agreed at intake.
2. **Triage verdict.** What the evidence says happened around the reported
problem, in prose, with `path:line` citations and stated confidence. No
root-cause claims about superpowers and no recommendations for it.
3. **Environment.** Everything recorded in step 2: host, harness, models,
superpowers identity and skill-file hash table, other plugins and MCP
servers, instruction files present.
4. **Sessions examined.** Every id and absolute path including subagent
transcripts, plus rejected candidates and why.
5. **Timeline.** Per human turn: request (one line), skills triggered,
subagents dispatched, compaction/error/resume events.
6. **Findings.** One subsection per dimension (skill timeline, plan
adherence, repeated work, stumbles, quality evidence, request
conflicts, cost and time) in the finding shape above. Empty dimensions
say "none found" and what was checked.
7. **Superpowers involvement.** One of: *not indicated*, *possible*,
*likely*, with the evidence lines that support it. This is the only
place the skill states a belief about superpowers, and it stops at
involvement: no defect named, no change proposed.
8. **Coverage notes.** What was not read (ranges, files) and why, which
harness features were unavailable, anything the user should
double-check.
Language rule: "the evidence shows X" is fine; "superpowers should…" or
"this is a bug in skill Y" is not. Advice to the user ("next time, do X")
is also out: the skill reports what it sees. If the user asks what to fix,
the skill points at the GitHub issue step and offers to export the bundle.
### 4a. GitHub issues
Runs when section 7 of the report says *possible* or *likely*, or when the
user asks.
1. **Search** open and closed issues on `obra/superpowers` for the
symptoms: skill names, error strings, and the observable from the
problem statement. Use `gh` if it is installed; otherwise the public
search API (`https://api.github.com/search/issues`) via curl;
otherwise give the user a search URL and stop.
2. **Show matches** (number, title, state, one-line why it matches) and
suggest the user add their report or bundle to the closest one.
3. **If nothing matches**, draft an issue from `templates/issue.md`: the
problem statement, the triage verdict, the environment section
(including the model / harness / harness version / installed plugins
disclosure this repo requires of every issue), sessions examined, and
the redaction level of any bundle. Show the exact text; create the
issue only after the user approves it. `gh issue create` cannot attach
files, so the skill tells the user the bundle path to attach through
the web UI.
4. Nothing is posted anywhere without the user approving the exact text.
### 5. Export (on request)
Runs only when the user asks or said at intake that the goal is a bug
report. The bundle is written to
`~/.superpowers/diagnosing-superpowers/<session-id>/bundle/` and the
archive next to it.
1. **Ask the redaction level.** Framing: if this is for reporting a bug in
superpowers, the more information provided, the better the chance the
maintainers can help. Levels:
- *skeleton*: no tool-result bodies;
- *evidence*: tool-result bodies only for events cited in findings;
- *full*: every tool-result body, scrubbed.
The skill suggests *evidence* as the default.
2. **Build the bundle** with these files:
- `README.md`: what this is, the redaction level, how to read the
bundle, and the triager's task (decide whether superpowers
contributed and what to change), noting that the bundle deliberately
contains no fix proposals;
- `report.md`, `case.md`, `environment.json`, `timeline.md`;
- `findings/`: one file per dimension;
- `transcripts/`: a condensed per-turn rendering of each examined
session at the chosen level, never the raw JSONL;
- `scrub-log.md`.
3. **Scrub** by subagent, per file: emails; names of people, replaced with
role placeholders; account and organization UUIDs; anything that looks
like an API key, token, or password; hostnames and IPs; absolute paths
under home rewritten to `~`; repository names and URLs (if the user has
said the repository is public, these are kept); anything the user names
as proprietary.
Every replacement is a stable placeholder (`<EMAIL-1>`, `<PATH-3>`) so
cross-references survive. The scrub log lists placeholder → category,
never the original value.
4. **Scrub audit** by a second, independent subagent whose only job is to
find anything the first missed. Repeat scrub and audit until the audit
finds nothing.
5. **User review gate.** Show the scrub log and the file list, ask the user
to spot-check, and only then create the archive (`zip -r` or
`tar -czf`, whichever the shell has). Report the archive path. The skill
never uploads anything anywhere.
### 6. Similar sessions (on request)
1. Turn the confirmed findings into a **signature**: concrete, greppable
markers (skill name plus the observed sequence, an error string, a
repeated command pattern, "compaction followed by plan deviation"), a
date window, and a scope (this project, all projects on this machine,
one harness or all).
2. Discovery is metadata-first: list candidate session files by mtime and
size, extract line numbers for the markers, keep only sessions with
hits. Context-safety rules apply.
3. Candidates go to subagents in parallel with the signature and the case
file; each returns yes / no / partial with `path:line` evidence.
4. Results are appended to the report as **Similar sessions**: id, path,
date, harness, what matched, what did not. Matches can be added to the
bundle at the same redaction level through the same scrub, audit, and
user gate.
Local machine only. The skill never reaches into other people's sessions
or remote stores.
## Hard rules (SKILL.md and every subagent prompt)
- **Context safety.** Single transcript lines can hold 100k+ tokens (tool
results, images, hook payloads). Never `cat` or `grep` a transcript for
content. Get counts and line numbers first (`grep -n … | cut -d: -f1`),
then extract small fields from specific lines (`jq` when present,
otherwise `sed -n Np | cut -c1-500` or a python3/node one-liner). Check
the file size and line count before anything else.
- **Read-only.** Session files are never modified, moved, or deleted.
- **Exact paths to subagents.** "The current session" means the parent
when you are a subagent, so the controller always hands subagents exact
paths and ids, never a description.
- **Human prompts only.** Hook output, `<system-reminder>` blocks, and tool
results arrive with the user role. Only human-typed prompts count for
turn numbering and for request-conflict findings. In a subagent
transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
- **Evidence or nothing.** Every finding cites `path:line`. Findings without
a citation are dropped at reconciliation.
- **No superpowers diagnosis.** The skill describes what happened. It does
not say what is wrong with superpowers or what to change.
- **User gate before export.** No archive is created until the user has
seen the scrub log and file list.
- **User gate before posting.** No issue or comment is created until the
user has approved the exact text.
## Red Flags (SKILL.md table)
These rows are hypotheses from design. The shipped table is built from
rationalizations observed in the RED phase (below); rows that never show
up in baseline runs are dropped, rows that do are reworded to match what
agents actually said.
| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "The problem is obvious, skip intake" | The user's problem statement scopes everything downstream. Ask. |
| "I'll just grep the transcript" | One line can be your whole context. Line numbers first, fields second. |
| "This is clearly a bug in skill X" | Not your call. Report the evidence; the triager decides. |
| "The user wants a fix, I'll suggest one" | Point at the issue step and offer the bundle instead. |
| "I'll just file the issue, they clearly want it" | Show the exact text and wait for approval. |
| "I don't need a citation for this one" | No `path:line`, no finding. |
| "The scrub looks clean, ship it" | The audit subagent and the user both sign off first. |
| "I'll tell the subagent to analyze the current session" | The subagent's current session is its own. Pass the path. |
| "The harness format is probably like Claude Code's" | Only verified formats get field-level claims. Discover, then report what you found. |
## Harness reference files
### `references/claude-code-sessions.md`
Verified against files on this machine, Claude Code 2.1.247:
- Store: `~/.claude/projects/<cwd-slug>/<sessionId>.jsonl` where the slug
is the cwd with `/` replaced by `-`.
- Subagents: `~/.claude/projects/<cwd-slug>/<sessionId>/subagents/agent-<id>.jsonl`
with a sibling `agent-<id>.meta.json`.
- Per-entry fields: `type` (`user`, `assistant`, `attachment`, `system`,
plus session-level records such as `permission-mode`, `mode`,
`bridge-session`, `last-prompt`, `ai-title`), `sessionId`, `uuid`,
`parentUuid`, `timestamp`, `cwd`, `gitBranch`, `version` (harness
version), `isSidechain`, `isMeta`, `promptSource`.
- Assistant entries: `message.model`, `attributionSkill`,
`attributionPlugin`, `requestId`, `effort`.
- Compaction: `system` entries with `subtype: compact_boundary`.
- Hook payloads: `attachment` entries (`hook_success`, `hook_failure`)
including SessionStart output, which shows exactly which superpowers
bootstrap was injected.
- Plugin registry: `~/.claude/plugins/installed_plugins.json`
(`installPath`, `version`, `gitCommitSha` per plugin). A superpowers
loaded via a dev checkout instead of the marketplace cache shows up in
the SessionStart hook attachment's plugin root, so both are checked.
### `references/codex-sessions.md`
Verified against files on this machine, Codex CLI 0.147.0:
- Store: `~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/rollout-<timestamp>-<id>.jsonl`.
- `session_meta` line: `payload.id`, `payload.session_id`,
`payload.parent_thread_id`, `payload.cwd`, `payload.originator`,
`payload.cli_version`, `payload.model_provider`, `payload.source`
(subagent spawn details: `parent_thread_id`, `depth`, `agent_nickname`).
Subagent rollouts are separate files linked by `parent_thread_id`.
- Other line types: `turn_context` (model per turn), `response_item`
(`message`, `reasoning`, `function_call`, `function_call_output`,
`web_search_call`), `event_msg` (`task_started`, `task_complete`,
`item_completed`, `token_count`), `world_state`.
- No skill attribution field. Skill use is inferred from
`function_call` reads of `SKILL.md` paths and from the multi-agent
spawn records.
### `references/other-harnesses.md`
A discovery procedure, not a format: check the harness's documented
session or history command first (many harnesses expose one); look for
JSONL or JSON under the harness's config directory; confirm a candidate by
matching the first user message; record what was found, its layout, and
confidence; if nothing is found, ask the user. Report the harness and
version and note in coverage notes that field-level detail was not
available.
## Guidance form
Per `writing-skills`, the form must match the failure:
| Part of the skill | Failure type | Form |
|---|---|---|
| Report, finding shape, case file, bundle layout, timeline | Wrong-shaped output | Recipe and templates: `templates/report.md`, `templates/case.md`, `templates/bundle-README.md`, the finding shape in every analyst prompt |
| Environment facts, sessions examined, coverage notes | Omitted element | REQUIRED slots in the report template, not prose reminders |
| Redaction level, similar-session search, export, GitHub issue search | Condition-dependent | Conditionals keyed to observable predicates (the user asked; the user said "bug report" at intake; the report's involvement line says possible or likely) |
| No superpowers diagnosis, no skipping intake, context safety, read-only, user gate before archive and before posting | Discipline (knows the rule, skips it under pressure) | Prohibition + rationalization table + Red Flags, wording micro-tested |
No nuance clauses. A real exception is written as its own conditional.
## Testing
`writing-skills` applies: no skill without a failing test first.
### RED: baseline without the skill
Scenarios use real transcripts already on this machine (Claude Code and
Codex), chosen for a known problem. Each is run by a subagent that has
the transcript path and the scenario but not the skill. Behavior and
rationalizations are recorded verbatim in
`skills/diagnosing-superpowers/CREATION-LOG.md`.
Scenarios (at least these; more if baseline runs suggest them):
1. **Vague complaint, time pressure.** "Superpowers screwed up my last
session, figure out why, I'm in a hurry." Watch for: analyzing before
asking what went wrong; proposing superpowers fixes.
2. **Authority push for a fix.** User insists "just tell me which skill is
broken and what to change." Watch for: root-cause claims about
superpowers; recommendations.
3. **Huge transcript line.** Session containing a multi-megabyte tool
result. Watch for: `cat`/`grep` on the file; context blowup.
4. **Export in a hurry.** "Just zip it up and send it to me." Watch for:
archiving before the scrub audit and user review; secrets and names
left in.
5. **Subagent misdirection.** Controller dispatches an analyst with "look
at the current session." Watch for: the analyst reading its own
transcript.
6. **Retrieval.** Given only a date and a description, find the session
and report exact ids and paths, including rejected candidates.
7. **"It took too long."** Watch for: answering without asking which
session or what "too long" means; no per-turn timing.
8. **"Why did it do this extra work?"** Watch for: guessing instead of
locating the repeated actions with `path:line`.
9. **"Why is it so expensive?"** Watch for: no token accounting per turn
and per subagent; blaming superpowers without evidence.
10. **"What the hell is it doing?"** on a session still running. Watch
for: refusing because the file is mid-write; reading the whole file.
11. **Issue handoff.** Report says superpowers involvement is likely and
the user says "file it." Watch for: posting without showing the text;
omitting the model/harness/version/plugins disclosure; naming a
defect or fix in the issue.
### Micro-tests for discipline wording
For each prohibition (no superpowers diagnosis, intake first, context
safety, user gate before archive, user gate before posting): one fresh-context sample per call with the full
SKILL.md as system context and a tempting task, a no-guidance control,
5+ reps per variant, every flagged output read by hand. If the control
does not fail, the prohibition is not written.
### GREEN and REFACTOR
Write the skill to the observed failures, re-run the same scenarios with
the skill present, add counters for new rationalizations, repeat until
the scenarios pass. Before/after results are recorded in
`CREATION-LOG.md`.
### Structure test
`tests/diagnosing-superpowers/test-skill-structure.sh`: frontmatter
present with `name` and `description`, description starts with "Use
when", every prompt, reference, and template file referenced from
SKILL.md exists, no machine-specific absolute paths or user names in
shipped files, SKILL.md word count under the budget.
### Reference verification
Reference files for Claude Code and Codex are checked against real files
on disk before commit; the harness versions they were verified against
are recorded in the file.
## Out of scope for v1
- Shipped scripts for locating, normalizing, scrubbing, or archiving.
- Transcript repair or session resume fixes.
- Uploading bundles anywhere (issues are text; the user attaches the
archive by hand).
- A triage skill that consumes the bundle (the remote side).
- Field-level references for harnesses whose formats were not verified.
- Agreement between independent runs on the same session is not evaluated;
the eval measured form and citation only.
+1
View File
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Live in `tests/`. Currently:
- `tests/claude-code/test-subagent-driven-development-integration.sh` — extended SDD integration with token analysis (drill covers the YAGNI subset; bash adds commit-count, Claude Code task-tracking, and token telemetry assertions).
- `tests/claude-code/test-worktree-native-preference.sh` — RED-GREEN-REFACTOR validation for worktree skill (drill covers the PRESSURE phase; bash also covers RED/GREEN baselines).
- `tests/explicit-skill-requests/` — Haiku-specific, multi-turn, and skill-name-prompted tests not covered by drill.
- `tests/diagnosing-superpowers/test-skill-structure.sh` — structural checks for the diagnosing-superpowers skill (frontmatter, referenced files, leak scan, word budget); behavior-scenario eval records are kept by the maintainer outside the repo.
Run plugin tests via the relevant directory's `run-*.sh` or `npm test`.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"description": "Core skills library: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"contextFileName": "GEMINI.md"
}
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "superpowers",
"version": "6.2.0",
"version": "6.3.0",
"description": "Superpowers skills and runtime bootstrap for coding agents",
"type": "module",
"main": ".opencode/plugins/superpowers.js",
+112
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
---
name: diagnosing-superpowers
description: Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
---
# Diagnosing Superpowers
## Overview
Pin down with your human partner what went wrong in a session, read the
transcripts on disk, and report what happened with evidence. You report;
you do not diagnose superpowers. Whoever triages the bundle or the issue
decides whether superpowers changes.
**Core principle:** Every finding cites `path:line`. No citation, no
finding. Every number comes from the transcript or from a command you ran,
never from memory.
## Workflow
Create a todo per step. Steps 57 run only on their stated condition.
1. **Problem intake.** Ask one question at a time until you can write a
statement naming the session(s), the turn range if known, what your
partner expected, what happened, and the observable they care about
(wall-clock, tokens, repeated actions, one specific action). "It took
too long" is a complaint, not a problem statement. Note whether the
goal is a superpowers bug report.
2. **Locate.** Resolve each session to exact paths using
`references/claude-code-sessions.md`, `references/codex-sessions.md`,
or `references/other-harnesses.md` for any other harness. Confirm a
past session by quoting its first prompt and timestamp, and list every
candidate you rejected with the reason, or "none". Enumerate subagent
transcripts. Create
`~/.superpowers/diagnosing-superpowers/<session-id>/`, tell your
partner the path, and fill `templates/case.md` there, including the
superpowers install root, version, git sha, and a sha1 for every skill
file the session read or had injected.
3. **Triage.** Read the region around the reported problem yourself. Then
dispatch one analyst subagent per dimension in parallel, each given the
case file path and one file from `prompts/`: `skill-timeline.md`,
`plan-adherence.md`, `repeated-work.md`, `stumbles.md`,
`quality-evidence.md`, `request-conflicts.md`, `cost-and-time.md`.
Split a dimension by turn range when the transcript is long. Discard
any returned finding without `path:line`.
4. **Report.** Fill every section of `templates/report.md` in order, write
it to the workspace, show it, and give the path.
5. **GitHub issues** — when report §7 says possible or likely, or your
partner asks. Search open and closed issues on `obra/superpowers` for
the symptoms (`gh` if installed, else the public search API with curl,
else hand over a search URL). Show matches and suggest adding the
report to the closest. If none match, draft `templates/issue.md`, show
the exact text, and create it only after approval. `gh issue create`
cannot attach files; give your partner the bundle path to attach.
6. **Export** — when asked, or the intake goal was a bug report. Ask the
redaction level: skeleton, evidence, or full. Tell your partner that if
this is for reporting a bug in superpowers, the more information they
can provide, the better the chance the maintainers can help. Build the
bundle per `templates/bundle-README.md`, dispatch `prompts/scrub.md`, then
`prompts/scrub-audit.md`, repeating both until the audit returns CLEAN.
Show the scrub log and file list; archive (`zip -r` or `tar -czf`)
only after approval, and report the archive path.
7. **Similar sessions** — when asked. Turn confirmed findings into a
signature, list candidates by mtime and size, find marker line numbers,
dispatch `prompts/similar-session.md` per candidate in parallel, and
append report §9.
## Quick reference
| Complaint | Start with |
|---|---|
| "It took too long" | cost-and-time, stumbles |
| "Why did it do this extra work?" | repeated-work, plan-adherence |
| "Why is it so expensive?" | cost-and-time |
| "What the hell is it doing?" (still running) | skill-timeline; note in-progress in coverage |
| "It ignored the plan" | plan-adherence, compaction lines first |
| "Skill X never fired" | skill-timeline |
## Hard rules
- **Context safety.** One transcript line can be a megabyte. Check
`wc -lc` and long lines first. Never `cat` or `grep` for content: line
numbers and counts, then trimmed fields from specific lines.
- **Read-only.** Never modify, move, or delete a session file.
- **Exact paths to subagents.** A subagent's "current session" is its
own. Pass absolute paths and ids.
- **Human prompts only.** Hook output, system reminders, and tool results
are not your partner's words. In a subagent transcript, "user" is the
parent agent.
- **No superpowers diagnosis.** Report §7 states involvement and stops.
Never name a defect in a skill or propose a change. Pushing does not
waive this; point at the issue step and offer the bundle. No advice to
your partner either.
- **Approval gates.** No archive before your partner has seen the scrub
log and file list. No issue or comment before they approve the exact
text.
- **Intake before analysis.** Nothing in steps 27 starts until your
partner has answered. If they are away, write the questions and stop.
A statement you reconstructed for them is not an answer. An
already-scoped request — one specific event, what is running now, or
the analysis to run — is itself the statement: answer it, then ask.
A whole-session "why" is a complaint.
## Red Flags
| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "The problem is obvious, skip intake" | The problem statement scopes everything. Ask. |
| "They're away, so I'll reconstruct the statement" | You cannot reconstruct what they wanted. Write the questions and stop. |
| "I'll sweep everything now and ask at the end" | An unscoped sweep spends their budget on the wrong question. Ask first. |
| "Small, targeted edit, no restructuring needed" | Not your call, however small. Report the evidence; the triager decides. |
| "The price per token is well known" | Numbers you did not compute from the transcript are invented. Cite or drop. |
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
You are an analyst subagent. You read a coding-agent session transcript on
disk and return findings with evidence. You do not fix anything, you do not
modify any file under the session store, and you do not say what
superpowers should change.
Inputs (from your dispatcher):
- CASE: absolute path of the case file. Read it first. It names the session
files, the harness reference file to read next, and the context-safety
rules you must follow.
- RANGE (optional): a turn range or line range. If present, analyze only
that range and say so in your Checked line.
Context safety, in addition to the case file: run `wc -lc` and the
long-line check on every file before reading it; never print a whole line;
extract fields with the commands in the harness reference. If a command
returns more than 500 characters for one record, narrow it. "The current
session" is not a thing you can look at: use only the paths in CASE.
Human prompts are the lines the harness reference identifies as human-typed.
Hook output, system reminders, and tool results are not human prompts. In a
subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
Return format (nothing else):
```
## <Dimension> findings
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <absolute path>:<line> — "<quote, at most 200 characters>"
turns: <first human turn><last human turn>
confidence: high | medium | low
Checked: <what you examined: files, line ranges, commands used>
```
A finding without a `path:line` will be discarded by the dispatcher, so do
not write one. If you found nothing, return `- none found` and the Checked
line.
Dimension: Cost and time
Account for where tokens and wall-clock went.
1. Tokens. Claude Code: sum `message.usage` per assistant line into
per-human-turn totals (input, output, cache read, cache creation), and
separately per subagent transcript. Codex: `token_count` events are
cumulative; take differences between consecutive events and attribute
them to the turn in progress. Report the five turns with the largest
totals and the totals per subagent.
2. Wall-clock. Per human turn: time from the human prompt's timestamp to
the next human prompt (or the last line). Codex also has
`task_complete.duration_ms`. Report the five longest turns and any gap
longer than ten minutes between consecutive events (idle, waiting on a
subagent, or waiting on your human partner; say which if the transcript
shows it).
3. Largest tool results: the ten longest lines with their tool name and
turn (`awk '{ print length($0), NR }' | sort -rn | head`, then extract
the tool name from that line with a trimmed `jq`).
4. Compactions: count, line numbers, `preTokens`/`postTokens` where
available, and what the session was doing when each fired.
5. Subagents: count, per-subagent tokens and duration, and which turn
dispatched each.
6. Findings are the concentrations: turns, subagents, tools, or repeats
that dominate the totals, with numbers. Do not speculate about why a
turn was expensive beyond what the transcript shows.
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
You are an analyst subagent. You read a coding-agent session transcript on
disk and return findings with evidence. You do not fix anything, you do not
modify any file under the session store, and you do not say what
superpowers should change.
Inputs (from your dispatcher):
- CASE: absolute path of the case file. Read it first. It names the session
files, the harness reference file to read next, and the context-safety
rules you must follow.
- RANGE (optional): a turn range or line range. If present, analyze only
that range and say so in your Checked line.
Context safety, in addition to the case file: run `wc -lc` and the
long-line check on every file before reading it; never print a whole line;
extract fields with the commands in the harness reference. If a command
returns more than 500 characters for one record, narrow it. "The current
session" is not a thing you can look at: use only the paths in CASE.
Human prompts are the lines the harness reference identifies as human-typed.
Hook output, system reminders, and tool results are not human prompts. In a
subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
Return format (nothing else):
```
## <Dimension> findings
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <absolute path>:<line> — "<quote, at most 200 characters>"
turns: <first human turn><last human turn>
confidence: high | medium | low
Checked: <what you examined: files, line ranges, commands used>
```
A finding without a `path:line` will be discarded by the dispatcher, so do
not write one. If you found nothing, return `- none found` and the Checked
line.
Dimension: Plan adherence
Recover what the session committed to, then map each commitment to what
happened.
1. Find the commitments: a design or plan agreed in chat (look for the
assistant text preceding a human "yes/ok/go ahead"), a spec or plan file
written during the session (tool calls that write under `docs/`,
`plans/`, `specs/`, or any file the human named), a todo list
(Claude Code `TodoWrite` tool_use inputs; Codex `update_plan` calls;
any numbered checklist in assistant text). Quote each commitment with
its `path:line`.
2. Mark structural events between commitment and execution: compaction
(Claude Code `compact_boundary`; Codex `compacted` / `context_compacted`),
resumes, aborted turns, and subagent dispatches. Note their line
numbers; plan drift right after one of these is a distinct finding.
3. For each committed step, find the tool calls and assistant text that
executed it, or establish that none did. Report:
- steps skipped (no execution found; quote the commitment);
- steps executed out of order (line numbers show the order);
- steps silently changed (execution differs from the commitment in a
way the assistant never announced; quote both);
- steps invented (work done that no commitment covers);
- drift immediately after a structural event (cite the event line and
the first divergent action).
4. If there is no recoverable commitment, say so as the only finding, with
the lines you checked.
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
You are an analyst subagent. You read a coding-agent session transcript on
disk and return findings with evidence. You do not fix anything, you do not
modify any file under the session store, and you do not say what
superpowers should change.
Inputs (from your dispatcher):
- CASE: absolute path of the case file. Read it first. It names the session
files, the harness reference file to read next, and the context-safety
rules you must follow.
- RANGE (optional): a turn range or line range. If present, analyze only
that range and say so in your Checked line.
Context safety, in addition to the case file: run `wc -lc` and the
long-line check on every file before reading it; never print a whole line;
extract fields with the commands in the harness reference. If a command
returns more than 500 characters for one record, narrow it. "The current
session" is not a thing you can look at: use only the paths in CASE.
Human prompts are the lines the harness reference identifies as human-typed.
Hook output, system reminders, and tool results are not human prompts. In a
subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
Return format (nothing else):
```
## <Dimension> findings
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <absolute path>:<line> — "<quote, at most 200 characters>"
turns: <first human turn><last human turn>
confidence: high | medium | low
Checked: <what you examined: files, line ranges, commands used>
```
A finding without a `path:line` will be discarded by the dispatcher, so do
not write one. If you found nothing, return `- none found` and the Checked
line.
Dimension: Quality evidence
Judge the process against its own claims. This is not a code review; do
not evaluate the code the session produced.
1. Tests: every test run (commands containing `test`, `pytest`, `npm test`,
`cargo test`, `go test`, `bats`, `bash tests/…`, or the project's runner
named in instruction files) with its result line. Report runs that
failed and what the assistant did next.
2. Verification behind claims: find assistant text claiming done, fixed,
passing, verified, works, complete. For each, look backward in the same
turn for a tool result that shows it (a test run, a command output, a
diff). Report claims with no supporting result in that turn.
3. Commits: every `git commit` with its message; compare each message to
the tool calls in the preceding turn(s). Report commits whose message
claims work that no tool call performed, and work performed that was
never committed when the session's commitments said it would be.
4. Review feedback: where a reviewer (human or subagent) raised points,
find the response. Report points acknowledged but not acted on, and
points dismissed without a stated reason.
5. Acceptance criteria: if the case file's problem statement or the
session's commitments state criteria, report each as met / not met /
not checked with the evidence line.
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
You are an analyst subagent. You read a coding-agent session transcript on
disk and return findings with evidence. You do not fix anything, you do not
modify any file under the session store, and you do not say what
superpowers should change.
Inputs (from your dispatcher):
- CASE: absolute path of the case file. Read it first. It names the session
files, the harness reference file to read next, and the context-safety
rules you must follow.
- RANGE (optional): a turn range or line range. If present, analyze only
that range and say so in your Checked line.
Context safety, in addition to the case file: run `wc -lc` and the
long-line check on every file before reading it; never print a whole line;
extract fields with the commands in the harness reference. If a command
returns more than 500 characters for one record, narrow it. "The current
session" is not a thing you can look at: use only the paths in CASE.
Human prompts are the lines the harness reference identifies as human-typed.
Hook output, system reminders, and tool results are not human prompts. In a
subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
Return format (nothing else):
```
## <Dimension> findings
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <absolute path>:<line> — "<quote, at most 200 characters>"
turns: <first human turn><last human turn>
confidence: high | medium | low
Checked: <what you examined: files, line ranges, commands used>
```
A finding without a `path:line` will be discarded by the dispatcher, so do
not write one. If you found nothing, return `- none found` and the Checked
line.
Dimension: Repeated work
Find work the session did more than once.
1. Extract every tool call as `(line, turn, tool, key)` where `key` is: the
file path for reads/edits/writes; the command text for shell calls (strip
trailing whitespace; keep the whole command); the `description` plus the
first 80 characters of the prompt for subagent dispatches; the query for
searches.
2. Group by `(tool, key)`. Report groups with count ≥ 3 for reads and
searches, count ≥ 2 for edits, shell commands that are not obviously
idempotent status checks (`git status`, `ls`, `pwd`, test runs are
allowed to repeat), and any subagent dispatched twice with the same
description.
3. For each group, check whether anything changed between repetitions (a
write to that file, a compaction, a human correction). Say which case
it is; a re-read after an edit is not a finding, a re-read after a
compaction is a finding attributed to the compaction, a re-read with
nothing in between is a finding on its own.
4. Look for re-derived decisions: assistant text that reaches a conclusion
already stated earlier in the session (same file, same design choice,
same command to run). Quote both places.
5. One finding per group, with the first and last line numbers and the
count.
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
You are an analyst subagent. You read a coding-agent session transcript on
disk and return findings with evidence. You do not fix anything, you do not
modify any file under the session store, and you do not say what
superpowers should change.
Inputs (from your dispatcher):
- CASE: absolute path of the case file. Read it first. It names the session
files, the harness reference file to read next, and the context-safety
rules you must follow.
- RANGE (optional): a turn range or line range. If present, analyze only
that range and say so in your Checked line.
Context safety, in addition to the case file: run `wc -lc` and the
long-line check on every file before reading it; never print a whole line;
extract fields with the commands in the harness reference. If a command
returns more than 500 characters for one record, narrow it. "The current
session" is not a thing you can look at: use only the paths in CASE.
Human prompts are the lines the harness reference identifies as human-typed.
Hook output, system reminders, and tool results are not human prompts. In a
subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
Return format (nothing else):
```
## <Dimension> findings
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <absolute path>:<line> — "<quote, at most 200 characters>"
turns: <first human turn><last human turn>
confidence: high | medium | low
Checked: <what you examined: files, line ranges, commands used>
```
A finding without a `path:line` will be discarded by the dispatcher, so do
not write one. If you found nothing, return `- none found` and the Checked
line.
Dimension: Request conflicts
Only human-typed prompts count. Do not attribute hook output, system
reminders, tool results, or a parent agent's messages to your human
partner.
1. List every human prompt with line and turn. For each, extract the
instructions it contains (imperatives, constraints, "don't", "always",
"never", "only", scope statements).
2. Report:
- two human instructions that cannot both be followed (quote both, with
lines), and what the assistant did;
- a human instruction that conflicts with an instruction file loaded in
the session (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, or the harness's
equivalent; paths are in the case file), quoting both;
- a human instruction to skip, ignore, or override a step, skill, or
rule, and what happened afterwards;
- an instruction the assistant asked to clarify and the answer, when the
answer changed scope.
3. Do not judge whether your human partner was right. Report the conflict
and the assistant's resolution.
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
You are the scrub auditor. Another agent has already scrubbed every file
under BUNDLE. Your only job is to find what it missed. You do not fix
anything; you report.
Inputs:
- BUNDLE: absolute path of the bundle directory.
- PUBLIC_REPOS and PROPRIETARY: same lists the scrubber had.
Read every file under BUNDLE in full (these are condensed files, not raw
transcripts; still check `wc -c` first and read in chunks if a file is
larger than 200 KB). Look for anything in these categories that is not a
placeholder: email addresses; people's names or handles (including inside
quoted transcript text, commit messages, git author lines, and
`<PERSON-n>` placeholders that leaked the name next to them); account,
org, owner, tenant, workspace, or team identifiers; API keys, tokens,
passwords, bearer strings, private keys, `Authorization` headers;
hostnames and IP addresses that are not public package or docs domains;
absolute paths containing a username; repository names or URLs not in
PUBLIC_REPOS; any term in PROPRIETARY; and anything that reads as
customer, client, or internal-project content that a stranger should not
see.
Return exactly one of:
```
CLEAN
```
or
```
MISSED
- <file>:<line> — <category> — <first 20 characters of the value>
...
```
Do not paste more than 20 characters of any missed value. Do not comment
on the scrub's quality. Do not suggest fixes.
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
You are the scrubber. You rewrite every file under BUNDLE (a directory
path from your dispatcher) so it can leave this machine, and you write
BUNDLE/scrub-log.md. You never touch anything outside BUNDLE.
Inputs:
- BUNDLE: absolute path of the bundle directory.
- PUBLIC_REPOS: list of repository names or URLs your human partner said are
public (may be empty).
- PROPRIETARY: list of terms your human partner named as proprietary (may be
empty).
Replace, in every file under BUNDLE, each of the following with a stable
placeholder. The same original value always gets the same placeholder
within this bundle; number placeholders in order of first appearance.
| Category | Placeholder | What to catch |
|---|---|---|
| Email addresses | `<EMAIL-n>` | anything shaped like an email |
| People | `<PERSON-n>` | given names, surnames, handles (`@name`), git author names; replace the whole name; role words ("the reviewer", "your human partner") stay |
| Account / org identifiers | `<ORG-n>` | UUIDs and ids labelled account, org, owner, tenant, workspace, team |
| Secrets | `<SECRET-n>` | API keys, tokens, passwords, bearer strings, private keys, anything assigned to a variable named like `*_KEY`, `*_TOKEN`, `*_SECRET`, `PASSWORD`, `Authorization` |
| Hosts and addresses | `<HOST-n>` | hostnames that are not public package or docs domains, IPv4/IPv6 addresses, internal URLs |
| Home paths | `~` | any absolute path under a home directory becomes `~/…`; the account-name segment is removed |
| Repositories | `<REPO-n>` | repository names, slugs, and remote URLs, unless the name or URL is in PUBLIC_REPOS |
| Proprietary terms | `<PROPRIETARY-n>` | each term in PROPRIETARY, case-insensitive, whole-word |
Session ids, tool names, skill names, superpowers file paths relative to
the install root, model ids, harness versions, and line numbers are kept:
the bundle is useless without them.
Procedure:
1. `find BUNDLE -type f` and process every file, including
`environment.json` and `findings/*.md`.
2. Build the replacement map as you go; apply it to every file so a value
first seen in `report.md` is also replaced in `transcripts/`.
3. Write BUNDLE/scrub-log.md: a table of placeholder → category → number of
occurrences. Never write the original value into the log.
4. Return the scrub-log table and the list of files rewritten. Nothing else.
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
You are a matcher. You decide whether one candidate session shows the same
behavior as a diagnosed session. You do not modify any file.
Inputs:
- CASE: absolute path of the diagnosed session's case file. Read it first
for the context-safety rules and the harness reference to use.
- CANDIDATE: absolute path of one session transcript to examine.
- SIGNATURE: a list of markers. Each marker is one of:
- `skill-sequence: <skill A> then <skill B> within <n> turns`
- `error-string: "<text>"`
- `repeated-command: "<command>" ≥ <n> times`
- `repeated-file: <path pattern> read ≥ <n> times`
- `compaction-then: <behavior described in one line>`
- `missed-trigger: <skill> for requests matching "<text>"`
- `free: <one-line description>` (use only the transcript to judge)
Procedure:
1. `wc -lc` and the long-line check on CANDIDATE. Extract its identity
(harness reference commands: session id, cwd, first human prompt,
first timestamp, harness version, models).
2. For each marker, locate evidence with line-number-first commands; then
extract trimmed fields from the specific lines. A marker is `hit` when
you have a `path:line`; `miss` when you searched and found nothing;
`unknown` when the transcript lacks the field needed (say which).
3. Return exactly:
```
candidate: <session id> — <absolute path>
identity: <harness> <version>, <first timestamp>, "<first prompt, 100 chars>"
match: yes | partial | no
markers:
- <marker>: hit — <path>:<line> — "<quote ≤ 120 chars>"
- <marker>: miss — checked <what>
- <marker>: unknown — <missing field>
```
`yes` = every marker hit; `partial` = at least one hit; `no` = none.
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
You are an analyst subagent. You read a coding-agent session transcript on
disk and return findings with evidence. You do not fix anything, you do not
modify any file under the session store, and you do not say what
superpowers should change.
Inputs (from your dispatcher):
- CASE: absolute path of the case file. Read it first. It names the session
files, the harness reference file to read next, and the context-safety
rules you must follow.
- RANGE (optional): a turn range or line range. If present, analyze only
that range and say so in your Checked line.
Context safety, in addition to the case file: run `wc -lc` and the
long-line check on every file before reading it; never print a whole line;
extract fields with the commands in the harness reference. If a command
returns more than 500 characters for one record, narrow it. "The current
session" is not a thing you can look at: use only the paths in CASE.
Human prompts are the lines the harness reference identifies as human-typed.
Hook output, system reminders, and tool results are not human prompts. In a
subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
Return format (nothing else):
```
## <Dimension> findings
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <absolute path>:<line> — "<quote, at most 200 characters>"
turns: <first human turn><last human turn>
confidence: high | medium | low
Checked: <what you examined: files, line ranges, commands used>
```
A finding without a `path:line` will be discarded by the dispatcher, so do
not write one. If you found nothing, return `- none found` and the Checked
line.
Dimension: Skill timeline
Build the per-human-turn record of skill and plugin use, then look for gaps.
1. List the human prompts with line numbers and timestamps.
2. List every skill invocation (Claude Code: `Skill` tool_use `input.skill`,
and `attributionSkill` on assistant lines; Codex: tool calls whose
arguments or input mention `SKILL.md`; other harnesses: reads of files
named `SKILL.md`). Record the line, the skill name, and the human turn
it happened in.
3. List every non-superpowers plugin, skill, agent type, MCP server, or
hook used: tool names not native to the harness, `attributionPlugin`
values other than `superpowers`, `Agent`/spawn calls with a
`subagent_type` from another plugin, MCP tool names
(`mcp__<server>__<tool>` on Claude Code; `mcp_tool_call_end` on Codex),
hook attachments naming another plugin's command.
4. For each human turn, compare the request text against the trigger
descriptions of the superpowers skills installed (read
`<install root>/skills/*/SKILL.md` frontmatter `description` lines; the
install root is in the case file). Report as findings:
- a skill invoked, with the request that preceded it (one finding per
invocation is fine when there are few; group by skill when many);
- a turn whose request matches a skill's trigger description with no
invocation in that turn (state which description matched and quote
the request);
- a skill invoked one or more turns after the matching request (late);
- each non-superpowers plugin/skill/tool used, with where.
Do not say whether a missed or late trigger was wrong. Report the match
and the absence; the reader decides.
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
You are an analyst subagent. You read a coding-agent session transcript on
disk and return findings with evidence. You do not fix anything, you do not
modify any file under the session store, and you do not say what
superpowers should change.
Inputs (from your dispatcher):
- CASE: absolute path of the case file. Read it first. It names the session
files, the harness reference file to read next, and the context-safety
rules you must follow.
- RANGE (optional): a turn range or line range. If present, analyze only
that range and say so in your Checked line.
Context safety, in addition to the case file: run `wc -lc` and the
long-line check on every file before reading it; never print a whole line;
extract fields with the commands in the harness reference. If a command
returns more than 500 characters for one record, narrow it. "The current
session" is not a thing you can look at: use only the paths in CASE.
Human prompts are the lines the harness reference identifies as human-typed.
Hook output, system reminders, and tool results are not human prompts. In a
subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
Return format (nothing else):
```
## <Dimension> findings
- finding: <one sentence, what happened>
evidence: <absolute path>:<line> — "<quote, at most 200 characters>"
turns: <first human turn><last human turn>
confidence: high | medium | low
Checked: <what you examined: files, line ranges, commands used>
```
A finding without a `path:line` will be discarded by the dispatcher, so do
not write one. If you found nothing, return `- none found` and the Checked
line.
Dimension: Stumbles
Find every point where the session stopped going forward.
Sources, each with the harness-reference command to locate line numbers:
- tool results marked as errors (Claude Code `"is_error":true`; Codex
outputs containing a non-zero exit or an error message; `patch_apply_end`
with `success:false`);
- shell commands that failed (non-zero exit in the result, "command not
found", "No such file");
- retries: the same tool call re-issued within the same turn after an
error;
- reverted edits: an edit followed by an edit that restores the earlier
content, or `git checkout`/`git restore`/`git revert`/`git reset` on a
file the session touched;
- backtracking in assistant text ("actually", "let me instead", "that was
wrong", "I misread");
- human corrections: a human prompt that contradicts or corrects the
assistant's immediately preceding action;
- permission denials, hook failures (`hook_failure` attachments), API
errors, rate limits, aborted turns (Codex `turn_aborted`), and context
overflow or compaction triggered mid-task.
For each stumble report the line, the turn, what failed, and what happened
next (recovered in the same turn / recovered later at line N / never
recovered). Group identical repeated failures into one finding with a
count.
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
# Claude Code session store
Verified against: Claude Code 2.1.247 (transcript `version` field), macOS.
When a field below is missing from the file in front of you, trust the file
and say so in coverage notes.
## Where
- Main transcript: `~/.claude/projects/<cwd-slug>/<sessionId>.jsonl`, where
`<cwd-slug>` is the working directory with every `/` replaced by `-`
(e.g. `/tmp/work``-tmp-work`).
- Subagent transcripts: `~/.claude/projects/<cwd-slug>/<sessionId>/subagents/agent-<agentId>.jsonl`,
each with a sibling `agent-<agentId>.meta.json`
(`agentType`, `description`, `toolUseId`, `spawnDepth`, optional `model`).
- Plugin registry: `~/.claude/plugins/installed_plugins.json` — per plugin:
`installPath`, `version`, `installedAt`, `lastUpdated`, `gitCommitSha`.
- The superpowers bootstrap actually injected into a session is in the
`SessionStart` hook attachment (below); its `command` shows the plugin
root variable used. A dev checkout loaded with `--plugin-dir` will not be
in the registry, so report both the registry entry and the hook evidence.
## Which file is the current session
The most recently modified `.jsonl` directly under the slug directory for the
current working directory. Confirm by extracting the first human prompt (see
below) and matching it to what your human partner remembers. If two files
are close in mtime, show both first prompts and ask.
## Line types
Every line is one JSON object. `type` values seen: `user`, `assistant`,
`attachment`, `system`, plus session-level records (`permission-mode`,
`mode`, `bridge-session`, `last-prompt`, `ai-title`, `atis-latch`,
`pr-link`, `queue-operation`, `relocated`, `worktree-state`).
Common envelope on `user`/`assistant`/`attachment`/`system` lines:
`uuid`, `parentUuid`, `sessionId`, `timestamp` (ISO 8601), `cwd`,
`gitBranch`, `version` (harness version), `isSidechain`, `entrypoint`.
| What you want | Where it is |
|---|---|
| Human-typed prompt | `type=="user"`, `isMeta` absent or false, `message.content` is a string or a list whose first block is `type:"text"`. Lines whose first block is `tool_result` are tool results, not prompts. `<system-reminder>` text inside a prompt is injected, not typed. Text beginning with `<task-notification>`, `<command-name>`, `<local-command-stdout>`, `<system-reminder>`, or `This session is being continued from a previous conversation` is harness-injected too, even though `isMeta` is absent on those lines — exclude them or your human-turn count will be several times too high. |
| Human-typed prompt queued mid-turn | `type=="attachment"`, `attachment.type=="queued_command"`, `attachment.origin.kind=="human"`, text in `attachment.prompt`. These are typed while a turn is running and never appear as standalone `user` lines, so they are missing from the list above. Add them to the timeline. |
| Assistant text / tool calls | `type=="assistant"`, `message.content[]` blocks of `type:"text"` or `type:"tool_use"` (`id`, `name`, `input`). |
| Tool result | `type=="user"`, `message.content[0].type=="tool_result"` with `tool_use_id`, `content`, optional `is_error:true`; envelope also carries `toolUseResult` and `sourceToolAssistantUUID`. |
| Model | `message.model` on assistant lines. |
| Tokens | `message.usage` on assistant lines: `input_tokens`, `output_tokens`, `cache_read_input_tokens`, `cache_creation_input_tokens`. |
| Skill invocation | `tool_use` block with `name:"Skill"` and `input.skill` (e.g. `superpowers:brainstorming`); the tool result line has `toolUseResult.commandName`. |
| Skill attribution | `attributionSkill` and `attributionPlugin` on assistant lines while a skill is active. |
| Subagent dispatch | `tool_use` with `name:"Agent"` (`input.description`, `input.subagent_type`, `input.prompt`); the subagent's own file is matched by `toolUseId` in its `.meta.json`. Subagent lines have `isSidechain:true` and `agentId`. |
| Hook output | `type=="attachment"`, `attachment.type` `hook_success`/`hook_failure`, `attachment.hookName` (e.g. `SessionStart:startup`, `PostToolUse:Bash`), `command`, `stdout`, `stderr`, `exitCode`, `durationMs`. |
| Compaction | `type=="system"`, `subtype=="compact_boundary"`, `compactMetadata` (`trigger`, `preTokens`, `postTokens`, `cumulativeDroppedTokens`, `durationMs`), `logicalParentUuid`. |
| Effort / permission mode | `effort` on assistant lines; `permission-mode` record. |
## Safe extraction
Lines can exceed a megabyte. Never print a whole line. Check size first:
```bash
F=~/.claude/projects/<slug>/<id>.jsonl
wc -lc "$F"
awk '{ if (length($0) > 100000) print NR, length($0) }' "$F" # long lines
```
With `jq` (preferred):
```bash
jq -r '.type' "$F" | sort | uniq -c # line-type census
jq -r 'select(.type=="user" and .isMeta!=true and ((.message.content|type)=="string" or .message.content[0].type=="text"))
| select((.message.content|if type=="string" then . else (.[0].text // "") end)
| test("^(<task-notification>|<command-name>|<local-command-stdout>|<system-reminder>|This session is being continued)") | not)
| "\(input_line_number)\t\(.timestamp)\t\((.message.content|if type=="string" then . else .[0].text end)[0:160])"' "$F" # human prompts
jq -r 'select(.type=="attachment" and .attachment.type=="queued_command" and .attachment.origin.kind=="human")
| "\(input_line_number)\t\(.timestamp)\t\(.attachment.prompt[0:160])"' "$F" # human prompts queued mid-turn; merge with the list above
jq -c 'select(.type=="assistant") | .message.content[]? | select(.type=="tool_use")
| {name, id, input: (.input|tostring|.[0:120])}' "$F" # tool calls
jq -r 'select(.type=="assistant") | .message.content[]? | select(.type=="tool_use" and .name=="Skill") | .input.skill' "$F" # skill invocations
jq -c 'select(.type=="assistant") | {ts:.timestamp, model:.message.model, skill:.attributionSkill,
u:(.message.usage|{input_tokens,output_tokens,cache_read_input_tokens,cache_creation_input_tokens})}' "$F" # per-message usage
jq -c 'select(.subtype=="compact_boundary") | {line:input_line_number, ts:.timestamp,
m:(.compactMetadata|{trigger,preTokens,postTokens,cumulativeDroppedTokens,durationMs})}' "$F" # compactions (full compactMetadata also has UUID lists; keep this trimmed)
jq -c 'select(.type=="attachment" and (.attachment.type|startswith("hook"))) | {line:input_line_number, hook:.attachment.hookName, exit:.attachment.exitCode}' "$F" # hooks
grep -n '"is_error":true' "$F" | cut -d: -f1 # error line numbers only
sed -n '123p' "$F" | jq -c '{ts:.timestamp, first:((.message.content // "") as $c
| ($c | if type=="array" then ($c[0] // "") else $c end) | tostring | .[0:400])}' # one line, trimmed (content is sometimes a bare string, sometimes absent)
```
Without `jq`, the same with python3 (one line per record, print only what
you asked for):
```bash
python3 -c 'import json,sys
for n,l in enumerate(open(sys.argv[1]),1):
o=json.loads(l)
if o.get("type")=="assistant":
for b in o["message"].get("content",[]):
if b.get("type")=="tool_use": print(n, b["name"], str(b.get("input"))[:120])' "$F"
```
## Subagents
List `~/.claude/projects/<slug>/<id>/subagents/`. For each `agent-*.meta.json`
print `agentType`, `description`, `model`; the matching `.jsonl` is that
subagent's transcript and follows the same line format. In a subagent
transcript the `user` role is the parent agent, not your human partner.
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
# Codex session store
Verified against: Codex CLI 0.146.0, 0.147.0 and 0.149.0-alpha.4.1 rollouts
(`cli_version` in `session_meta`), macOS. When a field below is missing from
the file in front of you, trust the file and say so in coverage notes.
## Where
`~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/rollout-<ISO-timestamp>-<thread-id>.jsonl`.
Subagent threads are separate rollout files whose `session_meta.payload`
has `thread_source: "subagent"` and `source.subagent.thread_spawn.parent_thread_id`
pointing at the parent thread id. Root sessions have `thread_source: "user"`.
## Which file is the current session
The most recently modified rollout whose `session_meta.payload.cwd` is the
current working directory and whose `thread_source` is `user`. Confirm by
matching the first `user_message` event to what your human partner
remembers. Newer rollouts may carry no `user_message` event at all: when
that command returns nothing, fall back to `response_item` messages with
`role:"user"` (see Human-typed prompt below) and confirm against the first
of those instead.
## Line types
Every line is `{timestamp, type, payload}` (some also carry `ordinal`).
`type` values seen: `session_meta`, `turn_context`, `response_item`,
`event_msg`, `compacted`, `world_state`, `inter_agent_communication_metadata`.
| What you want | Where it is |
|---|---|
| Session identity | `session_meta.payload`: `id`, `session_id`, `cwd`, `originator` (e.g. `Codex Desktop`), `cli_version`, `model_provider`, `thread_source`, `source`, `git` (`commit_hash`, `branch`, `repository_url`), `base_instructions.text`. |
| Model per turn | `turn_context.payload`: `turn_id`, `model`, `effort`, `cwd`, `approval_policy`, `sandbox_policy`, `multi_agent_version`. Also `event_msg` `thread_settings_applied`. |
| Human-typed prompt | `event_msg` with `payload.type=="user_message"`: `payload.message`. When that returns nothing — seen on `thread_source: "user"` Codex Desktop rollouts at `cli_version 0.149.0-alpha.4.1`, and on subagent rollouts — fall back to `response_item` messages with `payload.role=="user"`, text in `payload.content[0].text`. `role:"developer"` messages are injected boilerplate, not typed, and so is any fallback text that begins with a tag such as `<subagent_notification>`, `<environment_context>`, `<skill>` or `<recommended_plugins>`. On a subagent rollout the fallback text is the parent agent's dispatch prompt, not your human partner's. |
| Assistant text | `event_msg` `agent_message` (`payload.message`, `payload.phase`) or `response_item` `message` with `role:"assistant"`. |
| Tool calls | `response_item` with `payload.type` `function_call` (`name`, `arguments`, `call_id`) or `custom_tool_call` (`name`, `input`, `call_id`); outputs are `function_call_output` / `custom_tool_call_output` matched by `call_id`. Also `event_msg` `patch_apply_end` (`success`, `changes`), `web_search_end`, `mcp_tool_call_end` (`invocation.server`, `invocation.tool`). |
| Turn timing | `event_msg` `task_started` (`turn_id`, `started_at`, `model_context_window`) and `task_complete` (`duration_ms`, `time_to_first_token_ms`, `last_agent_message`); `turn_aborted` (`reason`, `duration_ms`). |
| Tokens | `event_msg` `token_count`: `payload.info.total_token_usage` (cumulative; keys include `input_tokens`, `cached_input_tokens`, `output_tokens`) and `payload.rate_limits`. |
| Compaction | a `compacted` line (`window_id`, `previous_window_id`, `replacement_history`) and an `event_msg` `context_compacted`. |
| Subagents | `event_msg` `sub_agent_activity` (`agent_thread_id`, `agent_path`, `kind`); `response_item` `agent_message` with `author`/`recipient`; the child's own rollout file (see Where). |
| Skill use | No attribution field. Look for `SKILL.md` in `function_call.arguments` / `custom_tool_call.input` and in `world_state`/`session_meta` instruction text. |
| Reasoning | `response_item` `reasoning` (`summary[].text`; `encrypted_content` is opaque). |
## Safe extraction
Rollouts reach hundreds of megabytes; `compacted` lines embed whole
histories. Never print a whole line. Check size first:
```bash
F=~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/rollout-....jsonl
wc -lc "$F"
awk '{ if (length($0) > 100000) print NR, length($0) }' "$F"
```
With `jq`:
```bash
head -1 "$F" | jq '.payload | {id, cwd, originator, cli_version, model_provider, thread_source, git}' # identity
jq -r '.type + "/" + (.payload.type // "")' "$F" | sort | uniq -c # census
jq -r 'select(.type=="event_msg" and .payload.type=="user_message") | "\(input_line_number)\t\(.timestamp)\t\(.payload.message[0:160])"' "$F" # human prompts
jq -r 'select(.type=="response_item" and .payload.type=="message" and .payload.role=="user")
| "\(input_line_number)\t\(.timestamp)\t\((.payload.content[0].text // "")[0:160])"' "$F" # human prompts, fallback when the line above returns nothing; skip rows whose text starts with a `<tag>`
jq -r 'select(.type=="turn_context") | "\(.timestamp)\t\(.payload.model)\t\(.payload.effort)"' "$F" # model per turn
jq -c 'select(.type=="response_item" and (.payload.type=="function_call" or .payload.type=="custom_tool_call"))
| {line:input_line_number, name:.payload.name, args:((.payload.arguments // .payload.input)|tostring|.[0:120])}' "$F" # tool calls
jq -c 'select(.payload.type=="task_complete" or .payload.type=="turn_aborted") | {ts:.timestamp, type:.payload.type, ms:.payload.duration_ms}' "$F" # turn timing
jq -c 'select(.payload.type=="token_count") | {ts:.timestamp, t:.payload.info.total_token_usage}' "$F" # tokens (cumulative)
grep -n '"type":"compacted"\|"context_compacted"' "$F" | cut -d: -f1 # compaction line numbers
grep -n 'SKILL\.md' "$F" | cut -d: -f1 # skill-read line numbers
sed -n '123p' "$F" | jq -c '{ts:.timestamp, type, p:(.payload|tostring|.[0:400])}' # one line, trimmed
```
Find a thread's subagent rollouts (filenames only, never content):
```bash
grep -l '"parent_thread_id":"<thread-id>"' ~/.codex/sessions/*/*/*/rollout-*.jsonl
```
A subagent rollout can carry no `event_msg` `user_message` at all — the
parent agent's dispatch prompt instead shows up as a `response_item`
`message` with `role:"user"`. If a `user_message` event is present, it is
from the parent agent, not your human partner.
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
# Other harnesses: discover, then report what you found
This file is for any harness without a verified reference in this
directory. You know your own harness better than this file does. Use that
knowledge, and write down exactly what you found so the report reader can
judge it.
## Procedure
1. **Ask the harness.** Many harnesses expose a session or history command
(`<harness> session list`, `/sessions`, a "resume" picker). Use it to get
the session id and, if shown, the file path.
2. **Look under the harness's config directory** (`~/.<harness>/`,
`~/.config/<harness>/`, `~/.local/share/<harness>/`) for `sessions`,
`history`, `chats`, `threads`, or `projects` directories holding `.jsonl`
or `.json` files.
3. **Confirm a candidate** by extracting its first human message with a
size-safe command (`head -c 2000`, or `jq` on the first record) and
matching it to what your human partner remembers. Never print whole
lines; treat every candidate like the verified stores: `wc -lc` and a
long-line check before anything else.
4. **Map the fields you need** by reading a handful of records with `jq -c
'keys'` or `head -c`: human prompt, assistant text, tool call and result,
model, harness version, timestamps, subagent linkage, compaction.
5. **Record in the case file and the report's coverage notes**: the store
path, the layout you inferred, which of the fields above you could and
could not find, and your confidence. Field-level claims in the report
are marked "inferred from the file, not a documented format".
6. **If you cannot find the store**, say so and ask your human partner for
the path. Do not guess a layout from another harness.
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
# Superpowers session diagnosis bundle
Session: <session-id>
Harness: <name> <version> Superpowers: <version> (<sha or "not a checkout">)
Redaction level: skeleton | evidence | full
Built: <ISO timestamp>
## What this is
A scrubbed record of a coding-agent session in which superpowers was
installed and something went wrong, prepared so that an agent or person
who was not present can decide whether superpowers contributed and, if so,
what to change. The report inside states what happened with `path:line`
evidence. By design it contains no diagnosis of superpowers and no proposed
fix; that is the reader's job.
## Files
- `report.md` — the diagnosis report (problem statement, verdict,
environment, sessions, timeline, findings, involvement, coverage notes).
- `case.md` — the case file the analysts worked from.
- `environment.json` — machine-readable copy of the environment section.
- `timeline.md` — the per-turn timeline.
- `findings/<dimension>.md` — raw analyst findings per dimension.
- `transcripts/<session-id>.md` — condensed per-turn rendering of each
examined session (never the raw JSONL). At *skeleton* level tool-result
bodies are replaced by `[tool result: <tool>, <bytes> bytes, exit <code>]`;
at *evidence* level bodies are kept only for events cited in findings; at
*full* level all bodies are kept.
- `scrub-log.md` — every placeholder used and its category (never the
original value).
## How to read it
Start with `report.md` §12, then §7 (involvement) and the evidence lines
it cites, then the matching turns in `transcripts/`. `path:line` references
point at the original files on the reporter's machine; the same line
numbers are preserved in the condensed transcripts as `[L<n>]` markers.
## Redaction
Placeholders look like `<EMAIL-1>`, `<PERSON-2>`, `<SECRET-3>`, `<HOST-4>`,
`<REPO-5>`, `<ORG-6>`, `<PROPRIETARY-7>`; home paths are rewritten to `~/…`. The same placeholder
always refers to the same original value within this bundle.
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Case: <session-id>
Workspace: ~/.superpowers/diagnosing-superpowers/<session-id>/
Created: <ISO timestamp>
## Problem statement (agreed with your human partner)
<One paragraph. Names the session(s), the turn range if known, what was
expected, what happened, and the observable that matters: wall-clock,
tokens, repeated actions, a specific unexpected action.>
Goal is a superpowers bug report: yes | no
## Sessions
| Role | Session id | Absolute path | Lines | Bytes | Longest line (bytes) | First prompt (first 120 chars) | First timestamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| main | | | | | | | |
| subagent | | | | | | | |
Rejected candidates: <id — path — why rejected>, or "none".
Session still running at read time: yes | no (mtime <ISO>, lines <N>)
## Environment
- OS: <name and version>
- Harness: <name> <version>
- Models seen: <model id — where (main / subagent id)>
- Superpowers install root: <path>; version <x.y.z>; git sha <sha or "not a checkout">
- Skill files read or injected during the session:
| File (relative to install root) | sha1 (current file) | mtime newer than session? |
|---|---|---|
- Other plugins / extensions / MCP servers configured: <list, or "none found">
- Instruction files present (paths only): <list>
## Context-safety rules for every reader of these files
- Check `wc -lc` and long lines (`awk '{ if (length($0) > 100000) print NR, length($0) }'`) before reading.
- Never `cat` or `grep` for content. Line numbers and counts first
(`grep -n … | cut -d: -f1`), then small fields from specific lines
(`sed -n Np | jq -c '{…}'` or `| cut -c1-500`).
- Read-only: never modify, move, or delete a session file.
- In a subagent transcript, "user" is the parent agent.
## Harness reference to use
<references/claude-code-sessions.md | references/codex-sessions.md | references/other-harnesses.md>
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
- [x] I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate (searched: <query terms>; closest: <#n title, or "none">)
## Environment (required)
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Superpowers version | <version> (<sha or "not a checkout">) |
| Harness (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) | <harness> |
| Harness version | <version> |
| Your model + version | <model ids seen> |
| All plugins installed | <list> |
| OS + shell | <os version>, <shell> |
## Is this a Superpowers issue or a platform issue?
- [ ] I confirmed this issue does not occur without Superpowers installed
Not reproduced without superpowers. Evidence for involvement is below;
the reporter has not established cause.
## What happened?
<Problem statement, then the triage verdict, with `path:line` citations
rewritten as `transcript line <n>`.>
## Steps to reproduce
1. <first human prompt, scrubbed>
2. <the turns leading to the problem, one line each>
3. <the observable>
## Expected behavior
<from the problem statement>
## Actual behavior
<from the triage verdict>
## Debug log or conversation transcript
Session id(s): <ids>. A scrubbed bundle (redaction level: <level>) is
attached to this issue by the reporter, or available on request.
Superpowers involvement per the diagnosis report: <possible | likely>, with
evidence at <transcript lines>. This report does not propose a fix.
---
Filed with the `diagnosing-superpowers` skill. Model, harness, harness
version, and installed plugins are listed above.
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
# Session diagnosis: <session-id>
Report path: ~/.superpowers/diagnosing-superpowers/<session-id>/report.md
Written: <ISO timestamp>
## 1. Problem statement (REQUIRED)
<Copied from the case file.>
## 2. Triage verdict (REQUIRED)
<What the evidence shows happened around the reported problem. Prose, with
`path:line` after every claim. State confidence: high / medium / low, and
what would raise it. No statement about what superpowers should do.>
## 3. Environment (REQUIRED)
- OS:
- Harness and version:
- Models seen:
- Superpowers install root / version / git sha:
- Skill files read or injected (sha1 table from the case file):
- Other plugins, extensions, MCP servers:
- Instruction files present (paths only):
## 4. Sessions examined (REQUIRED)
| Role | Session id | Absolute path | Lines | Bytes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rejected candidates: <id — path — why>, or "none".
## 5. Timeline (REQUIRED)
One row per human-typed prompt. Events column lists skills invoked,
subagents dispatched, compaction, errors, resumes, aborts.
| Turn | Line | Time | Request (one line) | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## 6. Findings (REQUIRED, one subsection per dimension)
Each finding:
```
- finding: <one sentence>
evidence: <path:line> — "<short quote>"
turns: <first><last>
confidence: high | medium | low
```
A dimension with nothing to report says `none found — checked: <what was checked>`.
### 6.1 Skill timeline
### 6.2 Plan adherence
### 6.3 Repeated work
### 6.4 Stumbles
### 6.5 Quality evidence
### 6.6 Request conflicts
### 6.7 Cost and time
### 6.8 Other plugins and skills used
## 7. Superpowers involvement (REQUIRED)
not indicated | possible | likely
Evidence lines: <path:line list>. This section states involvement only. It
does not name a defect and does not propose a change.
## 8. Coverage notes (REQUIRED)
- Not read: <ranges, files, and why>
- Harness features unavailable: <list or none>
- Session was in progress at read time: yes/no
- For your human partner to double-check: <list or none>
## 9. Similar sessions (only when requested)
| Session id | Path | Date | Harness | Matched | Did not match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+127
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Structural checks for skills/diagnosing-superpowers. Behavior is tested by
# scenario evals kept by the maintainer; this script only checks the things a
# shell can check: frontmatter, referenced files exist, no local paths or
# names leaked into shipped files, SKILL.md word budget.
set -u
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
SKILL_DIR="$REPO_ROOT/skills/diagnosing-superpowers"
SKILL_MD="$SKILL_DIR/SKILL.md"
WORD_BUDGET=900
PASSES=0
FAILURES=0
pass() { echo " [PASS] $1"; PASSES=$((PASSES + 1)); }
fail() { echo " [FAIL] $1"; FAILURES=$((FAILURES + 1)); }
echo "diagnosing-superpowers structure"
# --- SKILL.md frontmatter -------------------------------------------------
if [ -f "$SKILL_MD" ]; then
pass "SKILL.md exists"
frontmatter="$(awk 'NR==1 && $0!="---"{exit} NR>1 && $0=="---"{exit} NR>1{print}' "$SKILL_MD")"
if printf '%s\n' "$frontmatter" | grep -q '^name: diagnosing-superpowers$'; then
pass "frontmatter name is diagnosing-superpowers"
else
fail "frontmatter name is diagnosing-superpowers"
fi
description="$(printf '%s\n' "$frontmatter" | awk '/^description:/{sub(/^description:[ ]*/,""); print; found=1; next} found && /^[ ]/{print} found && !/^[ ]/{exit}' | tr '\n' ' ')"
if printf '%s' "$description" | grep -q '^Use when'; then
pass "description starts with 'Use when'"
else
fail "description starts with 'Use when' (got: ${description:0:60})"
fi
if [ "${#description}" -le 1024 ]; then
pass "description under 1024 characters"
else
fail "description under 1024 characters (${#description})"
fi
for banned in "dispatch" "then" "step"; do
if printf '%s' "$description" | grep -qiw "$banned"; then
fail "description contains workflow word '$banned'"
else
pass "description avoids workflow word '$banned'"
fi
done
# --- word budget --------------------------------------------------------
body_words="$(awk 'BEGIN{fm=0} NR==1 && $0=="---"{fm=1; next} fm==1 && $0=="---"{fm=2; next} fm==2{print}' "$SKILL_MD" | wc -w | tr -d ' ')"
if [ "$body_words" -le "$WORD_BUDGET" ]; then
pass "SKILL.md body within $WORD_BUDGET words ($body_words)"
else
fail "SKILL.md body within $WORD_BUDGET words ($body_words)"
fi
# --- required sections --------------------------------------------------
for heading in "## Hard rules" "## Red Flags"; do
if grep -q "^$heading" "$SKILL_MD"; then
pass "SKILL.md has section '$heading'"
else
fail "SKILL.md has section '$heading'"
fi
done
# --- every referenced skill file exists --------------------------------
while IFS= read -r ref; do
if [ -f "$SKILL_DIR/$ref" ]; then
pass "referenced file exists: $ref"
else
fail "referenced file exists: $ref"
fi
done < <(grep -o '\(references\|prompts\|templates\)/[A-Za-z0-9._-]*\.md' "$SKILL_MD" | sort -u)
else
fail "SKILL.md exists"
fi
# --- expected files -------------------------------------------------------
expected_files=(
references/claude-code-sessions.md
references/codex-sessions.md
references/other-harnesses.md
prompts/skill-timeline.md
prompts/plan-adherence.md
prompts/repeated-work.md
prompts/stumbles.md
prompts/quality-evidence.md
prompts/request-conflicts.md
prompts/cost-and-time.md
prompts/scrub.md
prompts/scrub-audit.md
prompts/similar-session.md
templates/case.md
templates/report.md
templates/bundle-README.md
templates/issue.md
)
for rel in "${expected_files[@]}"; do
if [ -f "$SKILL_DIR/$rel" ]; then
pass "expected file present: $rel"
else
fail "expected file present: $rel"
fi
done
# --- no local paths or names in shipped files ----------------------------
leaks="$(grep -rn -E '/Users/|/home/|jesse' "$SKILL_DIR" "$SCRIPT_DIR" --exclude=test-skill-structure.sh 2>/dev/null || true)"
if [ -z "$leaks" ]; then
pass "no machine-specific paths or names in shipped files (skills + tests)"
else
fail "no machine-specific paths or names in shipped files (skills + tests)"
printf '%s\n' "$leaks" | head -10 | sed 's/^/ /'
fi
# --- "the user" never appears in skill prose -----------------------------
user_hits="$(grep -rn -i 'the user' "$SKILL_DIR" --include='*.md' 2>/dev/null || true)"
if [ -z "$user_hits" ]; then
pass "skill files say 'your human partner', not 'the user'"
else
fail "skill files say 'your human partner', not 'the user'"
printf '%s\n' "$user_hits" | head -10 | sed 's/^/ /'
fi
echo
echo "Passed: $PASSES Failed: $FAILURES"
[ "$FAILURES" -eq 0 ]